Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: jdnicoll@xxxxxxxxx (James Nicoll)
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:24:46 +0000 (UTC)
In article <44eda86a$0$8868$88260bb3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Widget <widget@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://edition.cnn.com/2006/TECH/space/08/24/pluto.ap/index.html
Pluto has been demoted and is no longer a planet.
Pluto Express was a waist of time and money, it's merely visiting a rock.
"Pluto is automatically disqualified because its oblong orbit
overlaps with Neptune's."
OK, this is the second place I've seen a claim like this in
the press. Is this just reporters talking to each other or can the IAU
possibly have missed that Neptune and Pluto are always vastly far apart?
I am leaning towards option A, myself.
--
http://www.cic.gc.ca/english/immigrate/
http://www.livejournal.com/users/james_nicoll
http://www.cafepress.com/jdnicoll (For all your "The problem with
defending the English language [...]" T-shirt, cup and tote-bag needs)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: Michael Kent
- Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: William C. Keel
- Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: Widget
- Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: Widget
- Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- References:
- Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- From: Widget
- Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- Prev by Date: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- Next by Date: Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- Previous by thread: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- Next by thread: Re: Pluto is a rock, not a planet
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|