Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: "Blurrt" <nathansr@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 26 Aug 2006 21:16:59 GMT
"Volker Hetzer" <firstname.lastname@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:EOOdneJqNu7GCW3ZRVnyrQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
GatherNoMoss wrote:http://rogersplanetaryclassification.bigblog.com.au/data/2/11182/file/rogersplanetaryclassificationwebpage4856320060826163909.htm
Blurrt wrote:
An ambiguity-free planetary classification method is put forward here:
This has probably been asked before, but what criteria does pluto fail?
Nathan.
" A Planet is a Celestial body that (a) has sufficient mass for its
self-gravity to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a
hydrostatic equilibrium (nearly round) shape"
Seems a perfectly resonable requirement to me.
People....this Pluto recatagorizing is just a sign we are becoming
more sophisticated.
The Aliens were laughing their asses off when they found out we were
calling Pluto a "Planet".
I couldn't make anything of the press releases so far.
They've added the requirement that a planet should have cleared the
neighborhood of any debris - but others have noted that this definition
excludes Jupiter and Earth from Planet status. Jupiter has its trojan
asteroids and Earth has a hoard of Apollo and Aten Asteroids.
Also, a celestial body, by this definition, cannot be called a planet on its
own merits.
The definition in the link above solves all the problems by first assigning
planetary status to a body then assigning a classification. There are still
8 primary planets, but a host of satellite and associate planets.
Nathan.
Nathan
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: Sander Vesik
- Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: Volker Hetzer
- Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- References:
- ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: Blurrt
- Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: GatherNoMoss
- Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- From: Volker Hetzer
- ambiguity-free planetary classification
- Prev by Date: Re: Pluto is Planet, We have 11 Planets.
- Next by Date: Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- Previous by thread: Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- Next by thread: Re: ambiguity-free planetary classification
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading