Re: Planet Definition
- From: Fred J. McCall <fmccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 23:08:17 GMT
agnifire@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
:A planet is a celestial body that (a) is by far the largest object in
:its local population[1], (b) has sufficient mass for its self-gravity
:to overcome rigid body forces so that it assumes a hydrostatic
:equilibrium (nearly round) shape (c) does not produce more energy that
:it absorbs from the sun over the life of the object.(d) The object must
:lie close to the plane of the elliptic.
Why d)?
:Some people want to have a requirement that the body does not produce
:energy by any nuclear fusion mechanism. The problem with that is 2
:billion years ago in Oklo, Gabon, Africa natural nuclear reactor was
:formed when a uranium-rich mineral deposit became inundated with
:groundwater that acted as a neutron moderator, and a strong chain
:reaction took place.
That's fission, not fusion.
:I think we need a condition that prevents wandering celestial objects
:from being considered planets.which is the object must lie close the
:plane of the elliptic.
That doesn't do it. What if a wanderer just happens to come in on the
plane of the ecliptic (not elliptic)?
:That lets Pluto out. I like Pluto because when I
:was young it was the most distant planet from the sun and now Neptune
:is.
So if evidence came forward that, say, Earth was a 'wanderer' it would
suddenly not count as a planet for you?
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Planet Definition
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Planet Definition
- Prev by Date: Re: Should "The Stick" be scrapped?
- Next by Date: Re: GMD Intercept Success
- Previous by thread: Re: Should "The Stick" be scrapped?
- Next by thread: Re: Planet Definition
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|