Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Sep 2006 13:44:01 -0400
"Brian Thorn" <bthorn64@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:7mr0h2dubq0lr8voianot65jcjuddkrtfq@xxxxxxxxxx
Well, there were only 6 manned Mercury missions, not 7, and only 4 of
those were on Atlas.
What does that have to do with Atlas V?
Note that at this point, Aries I has evolved so far from it's original
proposal that it's no longer very "shuttle derived". With all the changes
made, it's a new launch vehicle which has a few components that are going to
be based on the existing shuttle SRB's, but everything else is pretty new,
even the J2-X engine.
And I think Boeing would argue their assertion that only Atlas V is
capable of launching a capsule safely and reliably. Delta IV-Heavy has
plenty of payload performance to trade off for a safer trajectory.
I hope that Boeing makes that argument. Actually, I hope that LM and Boeing
make the same argument in front of Congress. Maybe that will wake up the
politicians a bit (except perhaps for the ones in a few districts who depend
on the current shuttle infrastructure for jobs).
Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Brian Thorn
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- References:
- Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Jonathan Goff
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Brian Thorn
- Man-Rating Atlas V
- Prev by Date: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Next by Date: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Previous by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Next by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|