Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: "Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Sep 2006 10:50:57 -0700
Rand Simberg wrote:
On Thu, 28 Sep 2006 07:05:31 -0500, in a place far, far away, "Paul F.
Dietz" <dietz@xxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
Monte Davis wrote:
Look: typical global demand for payload to LEO and beyond -- including
milkitary -- has been in the hundreds of tons per year for decades.
IF there were good reason to believe annual demand would grow swiftly
to tens of KILOtons and beyond, I would stipulate that your robust,
reliable TSTO -- or any of half a dozen other approaches to CATS --
could succeed and make money.
Demand growth has shown a strongly nonzero slope in the recent past.
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/Launch_rate.gif
That's a little too simplistic a statistic. I wonder what tonnage to
orbit looks like?
How about cost per launch by weight?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- References:
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: royls
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: Monte Davis
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Prev by Date: Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Next by Date: Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Previous by thread: Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Next by thread: Re: Waiting for controversy...?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|