Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: "Alex Terrell" <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Oct 2006 08:16:25 -0700
Will McLean wrote:
lou@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:Not enough for THE CEV, but perhaps enough to orbit a vehicle around
Will McLean wrote:
Nor are the changes for the CEV version *that* minor. Besides the
changes you mention, NASA believes it needs a higher thrust upper
stage, probably with more RL-10 engines. And the three core
configuration, which Atlas has never built.
No, the Atlas that is proposed to be man-rated is the 401 varient, with
just one core engine, a single centaur, and no solids. See
http://www.lockheedmartin.com/data/assets/13344.pdf
where this is very explicit.
Which is probably adequate for a LEO ferry, but not for the CEV, which
has an explicit requirement of being roomy enough for the longer lunar
mission and having enough delta-v to come back from lunar orbit.
the moon and bring the crew back safely.
See http://www.astronautix.com/craft/cev.htm for a damnation of the
overweight CEV.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: mmaker@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- References:
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: lou
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: lou
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Prev by Date: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Next by Date: Re: Deprogrammed yet?
- Previous by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Next by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|