Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: "Jonathan Goff" <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 2 Oct 2006 13:35:38 -0700
Will,
Which is probably adequate for a LEO ferry, but not for the CEV, which
has an explicit requirement of being roomy enough for the longer lunar
mission and having enough delta-v to come back from lunar orbit.
Of course, the particular architecture ESAS settled on was far from the
only way of skinning the cat. For instance, for the ~30klb CEV weight
under discussion, you could launch one capsule, one Bigelow Sundancer
module, and one LOX/Kero or LOX/Methane propulsion module capable of
providing the delta-V.
The whole "roomy enough" argument I think is rather silly. Building or
buying a separate mission module with sleeping, eating, and bathroom
facilities for long-term missions, and then docking it with the crew
transport
would make a lot more sense.
As for the delta-V....on-orbit refueling would allow you to build a
lunar
transfer vehicle that didn't have to pansy out and make the LSAM and
CEV do most of its job.
~Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- References:
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: lou
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: lou
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- From: Will McLean
- Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Prev by Date: Virgin Space Solar Power?
- Next by Date: Re: Eugene Cernan wants to go back to the past
- Previous by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Next by thread: Re: Man-Rating Atlas V
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|