sci.space.policy

• Date Index

---

• What would a NASA moon base accomplish?, Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• space shuttle replacement, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: space shuttle replacement, Sylvia Else
• Commercial Lunar Travel, Willie . Mookie
• Re: VEHICLE HAS EXPLODED ON THE LAUNCH PAD, Allen Thomson
  • Re: VEHICLE HAS EXPLODED ON THE LAUNCH PAD, Damon Hill
    • Re: VEHICLE HAS EXPLODED ON THE LAUNCH PAD, Pat Flannery
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: VEHICLE HAS EXPLODED ON THE LAUNCH PAD, Eric Chomko
• video?, DJSeebs
  • Re: video?, kT
  • Re: video?, Damon Hill
  • Re: video?, Joe Strout
    • Re: video?, Eric Chomko
      • Re: video?, Joe Strout
  • Re: video?, uray
    • Re: video?, Pat Flannery
• Re: Dig Deeply to Seek Life on Mars, Me
• Re: MDA deputy: PRC ASAT easily countered, Allen Thomson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: MDA deputy: PRC ASAT easily countered, Allen Thomson
• Momentary Political Events: Pearl Harbor, Allende, Gulf of Tonkin, Maine, & Liberty (was Al Gore on Space), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • Re: Momentary Political Events: Pearl Harbor, Allende, Gulf of Tonkin, Maine, & Liberty (was Al Gore on Space), Terrell Miller
    • Re: Momentary Political Events: Pearl Harbor, Allende, Gulf of Tonkin, Maine, & Liberty (was Al Gore on Space), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Momentary Political Events: Pearl Harbor, Allende, Gulf of Tonkin, Maine, & Liberty (was Al Gore on Space), Henry Spencer
• What will be left of Theocon's/Simberg's Florida if HE-WHO-SHALL-NOT-BE-NAMED doesn't intervene (was What would you like to be our major goals in space), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • Re: What will be left of Theocon's/Simberg's Florida if HE-WHO-SHALL-NOT-BE-NAMED doesn't intervene (was What would you like to be our major goals in space), Rand Simberg
• What would you like to be our cabal's goals in foreign policy (was What would you like to be our major goals in space), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• Anglo-AmeriKKKan & DeBeers (was Gold), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• Paper "Notes" not Redeemable in Anything (was Gold), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• Re: Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, Bill Bonde
  • Re: Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, William Elliot
    • Re: Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, kT
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, Brad Guth
    • [] Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, William Elliot
      • Re: [] Terrorforming Earth is a Bad Idea, Brad Guth
• Space Access '07 Latest Conference Information, SA'07
• Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
    • Re: Genocide, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: Genocide, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: Genocide, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
• Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Williamknowsbest
  • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Williamknowsbest
    • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Ian Parker
      • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, steve
      • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Ian Parker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Brad Guth
    • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Brad Guth
  • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Brad Guth
    • Re: USA urges scientists to block out sun, Brad Guth
• The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Jonathan
  • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Joe Strout
    • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Jonathan
      • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Brad Guth
      • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Jonathan
  • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Brad Guth
  • Re: The moon and Tom Hanks...'we don't need to go back there again.', Brad Guth
• Limited ASAT test ban treaty, Totorkon
• China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Jim Oberg
  • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Chris Jones
    • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Christopher
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Chris Jones
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Fred J . McCall
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Raghar
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Fred J . McCall
  • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Chris Jones
    • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Jim Oberg
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Jonathan
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Rand Simberg
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Chris Jones
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Rand Simberg
      • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Eric Chomko
      • Mainscream media and the misadministration (was China ASAT Hits Its Target), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Mike Rhino
    • Re: China ASAT Hits Its Target . . . And it's on West 43rd Street., Eric Chomko
• UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, William Elliot
  • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Ian Parker
    • Message not available
      • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Ian Parker
    • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Alex Terrell
      • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Ian Parker
      • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Alex Terrell
      • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Ian Parker
      • Re: UN dossier 'ends all climate-change doubt':, Pat Flannery
• Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Neil Fraser
  • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Brad Guth
  • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Jim Oberg
  • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Derek Lyons
  • The two factions of the Demopublican Party must fight the forgetting (was NASA must fight the forgetting), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Totorkon
    • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Brad Guth
  • Re: Commentary: NASA must fight the forgetting -, Eric Chomko
• Marsden retired, Hop David
• How about personal rapid transit (PRT) LOTS of LINKS v1.0 Rev 1, Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• Re: ...White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...who were they???, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...who were they???, Rand Simberg
  • Re: ...White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...who were they???, Fred J . McCall
    • Iwreck, Eternal P/Blame, Spin, and Credibility Gap (was White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ...White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...who were they???, Eric Chomko
    • Re: ...White House "Rump Group" created the Vision...who were they???, Fred J . McCall
• Re: Terraforming Venus is a bad idea, though not impossible, steve
  • Re: Terraforming Venus is a bad idea, though not impossible, Brad Guth
• Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, kT
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ed Kyle
    • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Jonathan
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Henry Spencer
    • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Henry Spencer
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Jeff Findley
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Jonathan
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Pat Flannery
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Parker
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Stirling
    • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Parker
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Parker
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Ian Parker
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Alex Terrell
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Brad Guth
  • Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?, Brad Guth
• for bernarr: extremely elegant tunes - lodya voyhu haywi - (1/1), alberik
• SpaceX static test?, Joe Strout
  • Re: SpaceX static test?, Rand Simberg
    • Re: SpaceX static test?, Eric Chomko
    • Re: SpaceX static test?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: SpaceX static test?, Joe Strout
      • Re: SpaceX static test?, Rand Simberg
      • [] SpaceX static test?, William Elliot
      • Re: [] SpaceX static test?, Henry Spencer
      • Re: [] SpaceX static test?, Monte Davis
      • Re: [] SpaceX static test?, John Schilling
      • Re: [] SpaceX static test?, kT
      • Re: [] SpaceX static test?, William Elliot
• New Russian radars, big satellite, Allen Thomson
  • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Ed Kyle
    • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Christopher
    • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Allen Thomson
      • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Pat Flannery
      • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, William C. Keel
      • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Louis Scheffer
      • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Rand Simberg
    • Re: New Russian radars, big satellite, Derek Lyons
• Michael Griffin on Why Explore Space?, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
• Mission: Impossible was a television adventures series Complete 7 season collection 171 episodes 41 DVDs, shielatukmol@xxxxxxxxx
• Militarization and The Moon-Mars Program: Another Wrong Turn in Space?, Jim Oberg
  • Re: Militarization and The Moon-Mars Program: Another Wrong Turn in Space?, Jonathan
    • Re: Militarization and The Moon-Mars Program: Another Wrong Turn in Space?, kT
      • Re: Militarization and The Moon-Mars Program: Another Wrong Turn in Space?, frédéric haessig
      • Re: Militarization and The Moon-Mars Program: Another Wrong Turn in Space?, Paul F. Dietz
• Svobodnyy to cease space launches, Allen Thomson
• The start of something big?, Totorkon
• Satellite defense, Frogwatch
  • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
    • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jake McGuire
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, frédéric haessig
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, frédéric haessig
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jake McGuire
      • Re: Satellite defense, Christopher
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Satellite defense, Christopher
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Satellite defense, Eric Chomko
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Fred J . McCall
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Jonathan
      • Message not available
      • Re: Satellite defense, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Satellite defense, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Satellite defense, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Satellite defense, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Satellite defense, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Satellite defense, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Satellite defense, Harri Tavaila
      • Re: Satellite defense, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Satellite defense, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Satellite defense, John Schilling
    • Re: Satellite defense, Brian Thorn
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
    • Re: Satellite defense, molczan
      • Re: Satellite defense, William C. Keel
      • Re: Satellite defense, Allen Thomson
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ian Stirling
      • Re: Satellite defense, Ed Kyle
• Ares I Review, Ed Kyle
  • Re: Ares I Review, surfduke
  • Re: Ares I Review, surfduke
    • Re: Ares I Review, Ed Kyle
      • Re: Ares I Review, surfduke
  • Re: Ares I Review, jbcharle
    • Re: Ares I Review, Ed Kyle
• Stupid and ignorant Americans, Christopher
  • Re: Stupid and ignorant Americans, Alex Terrell
• Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, Allen Thomson
  • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, Louis Scheffer
    • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, Allen Thomson
      • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, LouScheffer
      • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, Allen Thomson
    • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, Allen Thomson
  • Re: Chinese ASAT: possible factoids, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Looking for DC-X pictures, pbreed
• Chinese ASAT -- free-flier 'inspectors'??, Jim Oberg
  • Re: Chinese ASAT -- free-flier 'inspectors'??, cs_posting
• U.S. Lasered China/Russia Sats First, Ed Kyle
  • Re: U.S. Lasered China/Russia Sats First, Ed Kyle
    • Re: U.S. Lasered China/Russia Sats First, Rand Simberg
    • Re: U.S. Lasered China/Russia Sats First, Louis Scheffer
• A Good Review From ESA Astro.!, surfduke
• Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, jsavard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, Al
  • Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Did The Chinese Violate Any Treaties?, Eric Chomko
• Launch costs to soar, William Elliot
• Justice but a shame if.........., Frogwatch
  • Message not available
    • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., ianparker2
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., Frogwatch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., Rand Simberg
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., Frogwatch
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., Rand Simberg
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., Henry Spencer
      • Re: Justice but a shame if.........., ianparker2
• Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Christopher
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Jonathan
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, surfduke
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, surfduke
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, kT
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, kT
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
    • The US should be John Winthrop's "City Upon a Hill" example (was The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
    • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
    • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
    • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
      • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
    • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: ...The US Should BOMB Iranian Oil Facilities, Eric Chomko
• Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Christopher
  • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Brad Guth
  • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Rand Simberg
    • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Brad Guth
    • Message not available
      • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Emmanuel Goldstein
      • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Brad Guth
    • Message not available
      • Why Are Americans So Fucking Dumb?, kT
  • Re: Chinese Shoot Down Satellite, Brad Guth
• Re: Colonization Of The Stars And Contact With Aliens: The Last False Hope Of The Secularists, Monte Davis
• Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
  • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, kT
    • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, jacob navia
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, jacob navia
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, kT
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, kT
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jonathan
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jonathan
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Derek Lyons
      • Why Are Americans So Fucking Dumb?, kT
      • Have You No Sense Of Decency, Sir?, kT
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Hop David
      • Message not available
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Hop David
      • Message not available
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Hop David
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jonathan
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jorge R. Frank
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Frogwatch
      • Message not available
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT ATHREAT?, Jonathan
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT ATHREAT?, Emmanuel Goldstein
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT ATHREAT?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT ATHREAT?, kT
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT ATHREAT?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, CL
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Allen Thomson
  • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Terrell Miller
    • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Terrell Miller
      • Re: Oberg / IEEE Spectrum Online // CHINA'S SATELLITE KILLER: IS IT A THREAT?, Jim Oberg
• Companies that can help with 2810.1a Compliance, Matt Hickman
  • Re: Companies that can help with 2810.1a Compliance, surfduke
• Re: NASA Spacecraft En Route to Pluto Prepares for Jupiter Encounter, Katipo
  • Re: NASA Spacecraft En Route to Pluto Prepares for Jupiter Encounter, Eric Chomko
• Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
  • Re: Solar Shell, Pat Flannery
    • Re: Solar Shell, pete
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
    • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Terrell Miller
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Pat Flannery
      • PING William Mook and Scott Lowther, Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Message not available
      • Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Concept of PRT (was PING William Mook and Scott Lowther), Willie . Mookie
  • Re: Solar Shell, Sylvia Else
    • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, jsavard
      • Re: Solar Shell, stefanbanev@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Willie . Mookie
    • Re: Solar Shell, Alex Terrell
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, raphfrk
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Sylvia Else
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Sylvia Else
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Solar Shell, Sylvia Else
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Sylvia Else
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
  • Re: Solar Shell, jsavard
    • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, dogscoff
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
    • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherAT@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, scottlowtherATixDOTnetcomDOTcom
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
      • Re: Solar Shell, Williamknowsbest
    • Re: Solar Shell, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Solar Shell, Mike Combs
      • Re: Solar Shell, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Solar Shell, pete
      • Re: Solar Shell, Willie . Mookie
      • Re: Solar Shell, Willie . Mookie
• First Mention of SRB "Stick", Ed Kyle
• Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, Iain Young
  • Re: Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, surfduke
    • Re: Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, surfduke
    • Re: Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, Jorge R. Frank
  • Re: Visiting JSC Visitors Centre, Jorge R. Frank
• Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Jim Oberg
  • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, kT
  • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Pat Flannery
    • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Derek Lyons
      • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, liberalhere
      • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Derek Lyons
  • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Derek Lyons
    • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Pat Flannery
      • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Mike Rhino
      • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Pat Flannery
    • Re: Msnbc (Oberg): Space war debate takes new turn, Henry Spencer
• International Space Station is very noisy, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Jim Oberg
    • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Pat Flannery
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, pete
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, kT
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, kT
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Derek Lyons
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, kT
      • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Z 1 Y 0 N 3 X
    • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Pat Flannery
  • Re: International Space Station is very noisy, Pat Flannery
• rather cheap space transport, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: rather cheap space transport, Joe Strout
    • Re: rather cheap space transport, Henry Spencer
      • Re: rather cheap space transport, Joe Strout
  • Re: rather cheap space transport, Jeff Findley
• AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Jim Oberg
  • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, kT
    • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, surfduke
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Pat Flannery
      • Message not available
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Henry Spencer
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Terrell Miller
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Rand Simberg
      • Message not available
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Rand Simberg
      • Re: AWST: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Pat Flannery
  • Re: Chinese Test Anti-Satellite Weapon, Jonathan
• Re: Ares IV Revelation, Pat Flannery
  • Re: Ares IV Revelation, Williamknowsbest
    • Re: Ares IV Revelation, Williamknowsbest
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Ares IV Revelation, Williamknowsbest
• CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
  • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
    • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Glen Overby
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Message not available
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Message not available
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jeff Findley
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jake McGuire
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Derek Lyons
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Fred J . McCall
    • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Allen Thomson
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Rand Simberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
      • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
  • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Jim Oberg
    • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Rand Simberg
    • Re: CHICOM ASAT test?, Pat Flannery
• Scientists Warn of Diminished Earth Studies From Space, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Scientists Warn of Diminished Earth Studies From Space, simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Chris Jones
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
    • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
    • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Kislyakov (Novosti): Bleak outlook for Russian-U.S. space cooperation, Eric Chomko
• SpaceX tries again., dumpster4
  • Re: SpaceX tries again., Joe Strout
    • Re: SpaceX tries again., richard schumacher
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Rüdiger Klaehn
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Pat Flannery
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Joe Strout
    • Re: SpaceX tries again., dumpster4
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Joe Strout
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Pat Flannery
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Jeff Findley
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Pat Flannery
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Alex Terrell
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Jorge R. Frank
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Rand Simberg
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., dumpster4
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Derek Lyons
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Brian Thorn
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Rüdiger Klaehn
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Lee Valentine
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Henry Spencer
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Lee Valentine
  • Re: SpaceX tries again., simple_language@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: SpaceX tries again., Pat Flannery
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., kT
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Pat Flannery
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., dumpster4
      • Re: SpaceX tries again., Joe Strout
• No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, Jeff Findley
  • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
    • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, Jeff Findley
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, liberalhere
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, American
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, kT
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, surfduke
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, liberalhere
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, liberalhere
  • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
    • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, Jonathan
      • Re: No b.s. article about how NASA will continue to spend money at Michoud, no matter who wins the Ares I upper stage contract, columbiaaccidentinvestigation
• A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Jake McGuire
  • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Michael Turner
  • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Rand Simberg
    • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Jonathan Goff
      • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Rand Simberg
      • The bastardization of classical economics by COTS, Milkin' Fraudman, Rupert MurCROCK, and Privateered Brainwashing Scandal (was A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Jim Davis
  • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Monte Davis
  • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Derek Lyons
    • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Monte Davis
  • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Pat Flannery
    • Re: A moment of lucidity from Jeffrey Bell regarding COTS?, Jake McGuire
• Re: Nuclear detonations in outer space, Monte Davis
  • Re: Nuclear detonations in outer space, dlzc
• Re: Space Exploration, Monte Davis
  • Re: Space Exploration, Michael Turner
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Space Exploration, Monte Davis
  • Re: Space Exploration, Monte Davis
• Re: Doug Stanley - Faith Based NASA Rocket Designer, kT
• GRAVES operating frequency, Allen Thomson
• Re: "Concerned citizens" only hope for SPS......by Dr. Gerard K. O'Neill, Bill Haught, Council on Interplanetary Relations -- Multiversalist Geo-libertarian \(Communist\) Conspiracy
  • Towers for rectennas (was "Concerned citizens" only hope for SPS), Bill Haught, Council on Interplanetary Relations -- Multiversalist Geo-libertarian \(Communist\) Conspiracy
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: "Concerned citizens" only hope for SPS......by Dr. Gerard K. O'Neill, Bill Haught
• Wor$t ca$e $cenario: Udder non$en$e of milking taxpayer$ only hope for $P$ (was "Concerned citizens" only hope for SPS), Bill Haught
• Helliburton/Boeing hei$t only hope for $P$) (was Re: "Concerned citizens" only hope for SPS), Bill Haught
• Microwaves cause blindness and sterility, William Mook
  • Re: Microwaves cause blindness and sterility, ianparker2
    • Re: Microwaves cause blindness and sterility, William Mook
      • Re: Microwaves cause blindness and sterility, ianparker2
      • Re: Microwaves cause blindness and sterility, Williamknowsbest
• Google Base is open for service, surfduke
• Hi Guys! Yes There is Life on Mars!, surfduke
  • But does intelligent life exist on Earth? (was Hi Guys! Yes There is Life on Mars!), Bill Haught
• Making the Space Pier Practical NOW!, jsavard
  • Re: Making the Space Pier Practical NOW!, Joe Strout
    • Re: Making the Space Pier Practical NOW!, jsavard
• Re: Thorium Propulsion?, Monte Davis
• NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Allen Thomson
  • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Bill Haught
    • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Glen Overby
  • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Sylvia Else
    • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Henry Spencer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Allen Thomson
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Henry Spencer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Jake McGuire
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Henry Spencer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, David M. Palmer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Henry Spencer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Henry Spencer
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Jake McGuire
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Anthony Frost
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Anthony Frost
      • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, Fred J . McCall
  • Re: NRO sat reportedly in trouble, jacob navia
• limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Joe Strout
  • Re: limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Hop David
    • Message not available
      • Re: limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Joe Strout
      • Re: limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Hop David
      • Re: limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Hop David
      • Re: limit to possible asteroids at Earth-Sun L4 and L5?, Henry Spencer
• VERY LARGE aperture telescopes, Frogwatch
• who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, Joe Strout
  • Re: who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, Pat Flannery
    • Re: who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, steve
  • Re: who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, earlcolby . pottinger
  • Re: who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, Jonathan
    • Re: who's the right person to simulate winged human flight?, Joe Strout
• Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Michael Turner
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Michael Turner
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Lee Valentine
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, ralph buttigieg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Michael Turner
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Inflated Markets and the Business Case for Double-Time March to NEOs, Deimos, and Phobos (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, ralph buttigieg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Economic motive$ of elite$ (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Loss Minimization = No blood + trillion$ for oil (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Monte Davis
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, kT
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, James Nicoll
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Paul F. Dietz
      • Isabella, Columbus, Bush, and the space pier (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught
      • Re: Isabella, Columbus, Bush, and the space pier (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Stephen Horgan
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Stephen Horgan
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Michael Turner
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Geoffrey A. Landis
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Rand Simberg
      • Labour Economic 099: The Remedial Course for the Clueless or Footsteps to Moon Base Alpha by 2199 if we're lucky (was Footsteps to Mars), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
      • Re: Labour Economic 099: The Remedial Course for the Clueless or Footsteps to Moon Base Alpha by 2199 if we're lucky (was Footsteps to Mars), Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Joe Strout
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Jonathan Schattke
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Hop David
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Paul F. Dietz
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Hop David
      • Message not available
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Hop David
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Hop David
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Paul F. Dietz
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Paul F. Dietz
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
  • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
    • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Ordover
      • Re: Footsteps to Mars, Brad Guth
• Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, steve
  • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, William Elliot
    • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, steve
      • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, William Elliot
      • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, Eric Chomko
  • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, Stephen Horgan
  • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, Henry Spencer
    • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, Bill Haught
      • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, steve
      • Re: Will the first manned mission to Mars be a planned return trip, Jeff Findley
• Very large x-ray telescope, Frogwatch
• The moon as a gravitational lens, Frogwatch
  • Re: The moon as a gravitational lens, Frogwatch
  • Re: The moon as a gravitational lens, William Elliot
    • Re: The moon as a gravitational lens, jacob navia
• Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
  • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Joe Strout
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Joe Strout
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Eric Chomko
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Fred J . McCall
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Michael Turner
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Joe Strout
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Rand Simberg
  • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Jeff Findley
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, kT
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
  • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Alex Terrell
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Dr J R Stockton
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Rand Simberg
      • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Alex Terrell
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
    • Re: Questions regarding my Earth-to-LEO infrastructure biases, Bill Haught
• you are of to Mars, what would you take, Mark
  • Re: you are of to Mars, what would you take, William Elliot
    • Re: you are of to Mars, what would you take, Eric Chomko
• [links corrected] A pro-business way to spend the remaining 1.6435 trillion that would otherwise be sunk into Iwreck., Bill Haught
  • Re: [links corrected] A pro-business way to spend the remaining 1.6435 trillion that would otherwise be sunk into Iwreck., Rand Simberg
  • Foresight down, alternative links (was A pro-business way to spend the remaining 1.6435 trillion...), Bill Haught
• Civilizations in globular clusters, Frogwatch
• Re: EML1 Considerations, Brad Guth
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: EML1 Considerations, Brad Guth
  • Re: EML1 Considerations, Brad Guth
• Re: Thrity Years From Now, T C MCKEAN
  • Re: Thrity Years From Now, Rand Simberg
    • Re: Thrity Years From Now, T C MCKEAN
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Thrity Years From Now, American
    • Re: Thrity Years From Now, Paul F. Dietz
      • Re: Thrity Years From Now, kT
• Space pier, Sylvia Else
  • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
  • Re: Space pier, Michael Turner
    • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
    • Re: Space pier, Sylvia Else
  • Re: Space pier, Joe Strout
  • Re: Space pier, jsavard
    • Re: Space pier, Joe Strout
      • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
      • Re: Space pier, Joe Strout
      • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
      • Re: Space pier, Michael Turner
      • Re: Space pier, pete
      • Re: Space pier, jsavard
      • Re: Space pier, Joe Strout
      • Re: Space pier, pete
      • Re: Space pier, Michael Turner
      • Re: Space pier, jsavard
      • Re: Space pier, Michael Turner
      • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
      • Re: Space pier, Michael Turner
    • Re: Space pier, Bill Haught
• Re: I need ten votes!, Rand Simberg
  • Re: I need ten votes!, Eric Chomko
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: I need ten votes!, Rand Simberg
    • Re: I need ten votes!, Eric Chomko
  • Re: I need ten votes!, Eric Chomko
    • Re: I need ten votes!, Fred J . McCall
      • Marked this thread "Ignored," needed zero votes!!! (was I need ten votes!), Bill Haught -- IF YOU SEE A HAUGHTY COMMUNIST HUN IN A HEIßLUFTBALLONE, CALL ON THE OFFICE OF FATHERLAND SECRECY
• Location, Location, Location! -- Look up at NEAs, Deimos, Phobos, Ceres for the solution, Bill Haught
  • Re: Location, Location, Location! -- Look up at NEAs, Deimos, Phobos, Ceres for the solution, Fred J . McCall
    • New Analysis of Usenet Postings Indicates Lack of Intelligent Life on Earth (was Re: Location, Location, Location!), Bill Haught
• Re: Video of meteor striking the earth (is it real?), Christopher
• Scott Lowther is wrong!, William Mook
• Re: Superstrings could add gravitational cacophony to universe's chorus (Forwarded), Chris
• question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Joe Strout
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Frogwatch
    • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, kT
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Sylvia Else
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Mike Rhino
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Hop David
    • Message not available
      • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Hop David
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Brad Guth
  • Re: question about hitching a ride on an NEO, Brad Guth
• Re: If Iraq war $$ had gone to space?, Bill Haught
• A pro-business way to spend $U$356.5 billion to $2 trillion the only hope for SPS, Bill Haught
  • Re: A pro-business way to spend $U$356.5 billion to $2 trillion the only hope for SPS, kT
    • Re: A pro-busines