Re: FWD: He's Dead Jim! Saddam Hussen hanged until he was dead, dead, dead!

"Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> "Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:>
:> :
:> :Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> :> "Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> :>
:> :> :
:> :> :Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> :> :> "Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> :> :>
:> :> :> :
:> :> :> :Fred J. McCall wrote:
:> :> :> :> "Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> :
:> :> :> :> :Rand Simberg wrote:
:> :> :> :> :> On 3 Jan 2007 13:33:57 -0800, in a place far, far away, "Eric Chomko"
:> :> :> :> :> <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
:> :> :> :> :> a way as to indicate that:
:> :> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> :> >> Jeeze Rand... isn't this replying to him on sci.space.history, like you
:> :> :> :> :> >> said you wouldn't?
:> :> :> :> :> >
:> :> :> :> :> >He can't help himself. And he calls me the moron. LOL!!
:> :> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> :> Yes, because you demonstrate it, every day.
:> :> :> :> :
:> :> :> :> :So do you.
:> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> Yes, Rand usually demonstrates that you are a moron right after you
:> :> :> :> once again say something egregiously stupid ... pretty much after
:> :> :> :> every time you post, really...
:> :> :> :
:> :> :> :Yet, you claim that I jump in posts where I'm not included and here you
:> :> :> :are kissing Rand's ass. Nothing is clearer than that.
:> :> :>
:> :> :> How can I be "kissing Rand's ass" when he has me killfiled, you stupid
:> :> :> loon?
:> :> :
:> :> :But he responded to my post of which you knew that he would.
:> :>
:> :> Uh, want to try that one again in English?
:> :>
:> :> There's hardly anyone forcing you to copy my posts out so that Rand
:> :> (or anyone else, for that matter) can see them, so unless you stupidly
:> :> respond Rand wouldn't even see it.
:> :
:> :I post, Rand stupidly receives. Get the verb right.
:>
:> Get the part of speech right. I think the adverb 'stupidly' goes with
:> you, as you so succinctly demonstrate in your immediately preceding
:> remark.
:
:The verb is receive, retard...

You no doubt think you have a point. A pity that you're such an
illiterate dunderhead that you are perpetually unable to put one
across.

It is, however, progress on your part that you do not disagree with
the suggested assignment of the adverb 'stupidly' to you.

:>
:> :>
:> :> How's that "kissing Rand's ass" again?
:> :
:> :You'll do anything to get out of his killfile and it shows...
:>
:> Poor delusional Eric.
:
:hahahaha

Gibber some more, Eric...

:>
:> I know it's hard, but try thinking about it, Eric. What would I get
:> if I "get out of his killfile" that I don't already get? No gain, no
:> motive.
:
:So what is your motive for posting at all? To prove your superiority?

It varies by posting, of course. Why do you? Masochistic?

:> :>
:> :> :>
:> :> :> The only way Rand ever sees anything I write to you is if YOU are
:> :> :> stupid enough to respond. And you always are...
:> :> :
:> :> :Why you're kissing Rand's *** is what I want to know.
:> :>
:> :> Why you're sucking your brother's *** is what I want to know.
:> :
:> :Tsk, tsk, Freddy, low even for you. Must you always go coarse when
:> :you're losing an argument?
:>
:> The question is simply a response in kind to yours.
:
:No it isn't.

Of course it is. The only difference is that I substituted your
brother for Rand and had him facing the other way.

:You're vulgar. What would your mother say if she read your
:post?

Not much, except to ask why I bother with an idiot like you.

Why do you ask? Does your Mommy still have to approve your Internet
usage, Eric?

:>
:> :>
:> :> :I guess you want
:> :> :to get out of his killfile and by using me that is your best chance.
:> :>
:> :> Guess again. Perhaps you can tell me why you think I give a damn
:> :> whether Rand has me killfiled or not?
:> :
:> :Oh, you do...
:>
:> Then again, perhaps you can't, since it's just another counter-factual
:> statement on your part...
:>
:> :>
:> :> Actually, it's rather fun to point out that Rand can't have me
:> :> killfiled for the reasons he claims, since he reads and responds to
:> :> idiots like you. It makes my criticisms of him as ego-driven that
:> :> much more obviously true.
:> :
:> :Ego-driven? Perhaps, but maybe you're wrong as to why I am not in his
:> :killfile and why you are?
:>
:> I don't think so. You're easy to kick around and pathetically
:> ineffective at 'hitting back', Eric, so Rand keeps you around because
:> plumps his ego nicely when you're the opposition.
:
:If I'm so pathetic how come I haven't gone, run and hid?

Because you're too stupid to. I would have thought that was obvious.

Of course, you then go on to post proof of that, with the list of
idiotic things you believe, below:

:But I have
:shown Rand to be the pompous ass that he is.

You say that as if it's difficult. Hell, RAND shows Rand to be the
pompous ass that he is. He doesn't need any help with that any more
than you need someone to help make you look like an idiot.

:Your's and Rand's politics
:are similar and different than mine.

I think I know what you MEANT to say there, but you need to work on
your language skills. You just said that your politics are both
similar to and different from mine and Rand's. Funny how you lazily
leaving out that second verb shifts the meaning, isn't it?

Oh, and my politics and Rand's politics probably aren't all that
similar. You've yet to demonstrate you even understand what my views
on issues are, despite your repeated claims and my repeated requests
that you explain what you think the definitive issues are and what you
think my views on them are.

This, of course, led to the rather astounding revelation that you
aren't even bright enough to understand what 'political issues' are.

:That is all.

Oh, I doubt that. You'll natter on ad infinitum.

:If I'm so useful as
:entertainment then how come I continue to throw wit your's and Rand's
:way that you can't counter nor best?

Because you're deluded?

:Yes, I actually laugh at both of
:you with your smugness.

As I said, because you're delusional.

:You both know nothing about me and if you
:really did, you'd both end up retracting most of what you have said
:about me.

Want to bet?

:Freddy, I'm still here. You have failed to drive me off. The opposite
:really. So,what have you and Rand done again?

What makes you think anyone is trying to "drive you off", you paranoid
little ape? If I wanted you to 'disappear', it's a matter of a single
keystroke.

:>
:> That didn't work out so well for him with me...
:
:So when you killfiled me earlier I had you like you have Rand now?

Not hardly. In fact, several people REQUESTED that I killfile you
because they didn't want to see your drivel.

I frequently killfile people who are all noise and no signal, as you
are. I also frequently killfile people temporarily as sort of a
'cooling off' period to see if they will grow a brain in the interim.

However, I thought I'd try something a bit different with you this
time (given your failure to grow any brains in the interim) and see
just how stupid you actually were.

The answer, unsurprisingly, was 'VERY'.

:I
:stuck a huge spike in your ego? C'mon spell out why when you killfiled
:me it was different than why Rand has you killfiled now.

See above.

:Did you think I would forget that? hahahaha

No. I didn't expect you'd understand it, either. And of course you
don't. You see it through the window of your delusions, just as you
see everything else.

:>
:> :>
:> :> :Good luck, Freddy...
:> :>
:> :> I don't need luck, having intelligence and skills.
:> :
:> :Where? You seem to like hiding them then.
:>
:> Well, you probably can't recognize what you've never had, El
:> Chimpko...
:
:I'd run circles around you, Freddy...

Of course you would, Eric. Of course you would...

:>
:> :>
:> :> Good luck, El Chimpko. You DEFINITELY need it...
:> :
:> :As much as you value being right over simply learning, you are the one
:> :crippled. And you know what they say about luck, it is where
:> :opportunity meets preparation. ;)
:>
:> In your case, I suspect that Preparation H is more likely...
:
:I'm teaching you, Freddy. Are you learning?

Nothing I didn't know before. It seems the sole topic of instruction
you specialize in is "Eric Chomko is an idiot".

We all know that already...

--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.

Loading