Re: Satellite defense



Frogwatch wrote:
I vaguely remember that some US survelliance sats have the ability to
maneuver. Is this sufficient to dodge a hit to kill asat?

The satellite would have to have more maneuvering capability than the
ASAT that
is aiming to hit it. Since most spysats are big and heavy and most
ASATs are
small and very quick-footed, it would appear that most ASATs would
prevail in a
one-on-one contest. If not on the first shot, then on the next pass,
or the pass
after that. But if the spysat can deploy decoys or employ other means
to blind
the ASAT sensors before maneuvering, then the ASAT has a more difficult

problem to solve.

- Ed Kyle

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Satellite defense
    ... The satellite would have to have more maneuvering capability than the ... ASAT that is aiming to hit it. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Satellite defense
    ... The satellite would have to have more maneuvering capability than the ... ASAT that is aiming to hit it. ... radar and optical signature suppression. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Satellite defense
    ... The satellite would have to have more maneuvering capability than the ... ASAT that is aiming to hit it. ... If not on the first shot, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Satellite defense
    ... ASAT that is aiming to hit it. ... But if the spysat can ... maneuvering, then the ASAT has a ore difficult problem to solve.Stealth is another potential solution. ... Stealth and decoys, deployed together, might work too. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Satellite defense
    ... maneuver. ... Is this sufficient to dodge a hit to kill asat? ... The satellite would have to have more maneuvering capability than the ...
    (sci.space.policy)