Re: Satellite defense
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 24 Jan 2007 22:08:52 -0800
On Jan 24, 7:52 pm, "Jonathan" <b...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It'd be China that has to protect a supply line
and invasion force. Taiwan and the US would
be defending a fortress island.
Don't count on it. The US doesn't have forces on Taiwan, it no longer
has a Mutual Defense Treaty with Taiwan, and it officially does not
support Taiwan independence.
China's mainland is about 100 miles from Taiwan. The U.S. is 6,000
miles away. The math on the supply line situation is obvious.
Corregidor was a "fortress" too, but only for a while.
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jonathan
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Satellite defense
- References:
- Satellite defense
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jake McGuire
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: frédéric haessig
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jonathan
- Satellite defense
- Prev by Date: Re: Terraforming Venus is a bad idea, though not impossible
- Next by Date: Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?
- Previous by thread: Re: Satellite defense
- Next by thread: Re: Satellite defense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|