Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Sylvia Else <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 08:20:34 +1100
Ian Woollard wrote:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
Plus, once you put the cells in space you are going to have to be
continually replacing them due to radiation degradation.
Turns out not to be a big issue. When I spreadsheeted this, the payback on investment was only 2-3 years. Solar cells last longer than that on orbit, and the rest is almost all clear profit. So you can afford to keep launching.
Payback on investment in 2 to 3 years?
Perhaps you should make your analysis available for scrutiny.
Sylvia.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Ian Woollard
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- References:
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Ian Woollard
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Ian Woollard
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- Prev by Date: Re: Space Solar Power - A possible way of Reducing Rectenna size?
- Next by Date: Re: Genocide
- Previous by thread: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Next by thread: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Index(es):