Re: Satellite defense
- From: "Ed Kyle" <edkyle99@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 Jan 2007 14:32:50 -0800
On Jan 26, 1:53 am, "Jake McGuire" <jamcg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Allies also had complete air and naval superiority in the relevant
areas, in addition to experience in amphibious warfare. China can
count on none of the three. For all that the US Army and Marines are
bogged down in Iraq by a bunch of dudes with IEDs, the ability of the
USN to sink ships and the USAF to shoot down airplanes is still
astounding large.
China grows richer and more powerful every day compared
to the U.S.. Unless trade or monetary policies change, it
is only a matter of time until it surpasses the U.S. in both
economic and military power. Then the USN and USAF
would have to contemplate a foe with more and better
subs and ships and aircraft and missiles. Like the Allies
at Normandy, China will win the fight long before it actually
attacks. Remember how small and poorly outfitted the
U.S. military was just three or four years before Normandy?
- Ed Kyle
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Christopher
- Re: Satellite defense
- References:
- Satellite defense
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jake McGuire
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: frédéric haessig
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jonathan
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jonathan
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Ed Kyle
- Re: Satellite defense
- From: Jake McGuire
- Satellite defense
- Prev by Date: Re: Satellite defense
- Next by Date: How about personal rapid transit (PRT) LOTS of LINKS v1.0 Rev 1
- Previous by thread: Re: Satellite defense
- Next by thread: Re: Satellite defense
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|