Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Fred J. McCall <fmccall@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2007 13:32:18 GMT
Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
:I think the turn-around time on this is going to be more like a SR-71
:than a airliner; you are talking about something that's going to get get
:at least red hot during flight. You are going to want to give it a real
:good going over between flights, because it's going to be in a flight
:environment where even a slight failure or flaw can be fatal.
Isn't that pretty much true of any aircraft? An airframe failure will
kill you. It doesn't matter how fast or slow you're going. It's that
fall with bits coming off that gets you...
--
"Insisting on perfect safety is for people who don't have the balls to
live in the real world." -- Mary Shafer, NASA Dryden
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- References:
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Ian Woollard
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Len
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Ian Woollard
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Skylon SSTO
- Prev by Date: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Next by Date: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Previous by thread: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Next by thread: Re: Skylon SSTO
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|