Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:52:57 GMT
On 24 Feb 2007 18:30:46 -0800, in a place far, far away, "Eric Chomko"
<pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:
Fred J. McCall wrote:
"Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>
:> You equate someone asking if you want them to publish your office
:> phone number with threatening physical violence?
:
:What physical threats? I have never threaten you or anyone else on
:USENET. And if you think me mistaken, then produce the proof right now
:or post a retraction.
You're lying.
And your proof is?
And we've had this whole conversation before about how,
unlike you, I have better things to do with my life than dredge
through hundreds of your old posts to 'prove' to you that you said
something that has, as usual, slipped your memory.
So you feel threatened by me but are too lazy to dig up proof? Hmm...
seems like it's a case of not much of a threat or no threat.
No, Eric, I don't think you're lying. Just as your premature
Alzeimers causes you to have to ask the same stupid questions day
after day, even after they've been answered repeatedly, you also have
no memory of the numerous physical threats in these fora that you've
made to Fred, and others.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
- From: Eric Chomko
- Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
- Prev by Date: Re: Vision of the three Rs: Regular, Reliable and Reusable
- Next by Date: Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
- Previous by thread: Re: yay, we'll definitely get munched on april 13th 2036!!!!
- Next by thread: Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|