Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?




Rand Simberg wrote:
On 24 Feb 2007 18:30:46 -0800, in a place far, far away, "Eric Chomko"
<pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:


Fred J. McCall wrote:
"Eric Chomko" <pne.chomko@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

:
:Fred J. McCall wrote:
:>
:> You equate someone asking if you want them to publish your office
:> phone number with threatening physical violence?
:
:What physical threats? I have never threaten you or anyone else on
:USENET. And if you think me mistaken, then produce the proof right now
:or post a retraction.

You're lying.

And your proof is?

And we've had this whole conversation before about how,
unlike you, I have better things to do with my life than dredge
through hundreds of your old posts to 'prove' to you that you said
something that has, as usual, slipped your memory.

So you feel threatened by me but are too lazy to dig up proof? Hmm...
seems like it's a case of not much of a threat or no threat.

No, Eric, I don't think you're lying. Just as your premature
Alzeimers causes you to have to ask the same stupid questions day
after day, even after they've been answered repeatedly, you also have
no memory of the numerous physical threats in these fora that you've
made to Fred, and others.


Please provide proof, Rand. If what you say is true, and it does have
legal ramifications, then you can produce evidence of such threats.
Right? I take this seriously. I will not alow you to claim that I have
made threats to anyone without proof. Google is your friend. Either
prove that I have made threats or I will use this post and follow-on
posts as evidence that you lack evidence to back up your claim above.

Am I clear?

Eric

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
    ... Fred J. McCall wrote: ... :>:legal ramifications, then you can produce evidence of such threats. ... :>:posts as evidence that you lack evidence to back up your claim above. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
    ... :Rand Simberg wrote: ... :> no memory of the numerous physical threats in these fora that you've ... then you can produce evidence of such threats. ... :posts as evidence that you lack evidence to back up your claim above. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
    ... :Rand Simberg wrote: ... :> no memory of the numerous physical threats in these fora that you've ... then you can produce evidence of such threats. ... :posts as evidence that you lack evidence to back up your claim above. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Bye-bye INF treaty?
    ... Fred J. McCall wrote: ... something that has, as usual, slipped your memory. ... no memory of the numerous physical threats in these fora that you've ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Maccies arent fanatical? (by the way, what is a "Maccie?)
    ... not one any of the people using the term "Maccie" have made. ... No, Mayor... ... I even asked how many threats the guy received above (thereby ... doesn't stop you from using things not in evidence to make some case ...
    (comp.sys.mac.advocacy)