Re: A Modest Proposal
- From: "Len" <len@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 Mar 2007 12:56:00 -0800
On Mar 7, 2:06 pm, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
Here's a guy who wants to solve global warming by filling the upper
atmosphere with SO2.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/programmes/6369971.stm
I think this would be a great market for suborbital space transports.
http://www.transterrestrial.com/archives/008613.html#008613
Interesting, Rand. Interesting enough that I
have filed it away. However, the first stage of
an orbital sytem might be more appropriate
than a "suborbital" system--at a least suborbital
system that is designed to go to 100 km.
Our carrier stage could lift about 200 tonnes
to 30-40 km for under $1 million per flight.
The volcano equivalent--10 million tonnes--
would require require perhaps 50,000 flights.
At that rate, cost per flight should come down
quite a bit. $100,000 per flight would cost
$5 billion. However, it may, or may not, be
more cost-effective than sun-synchronous or
other shading/deflection--or, as Joe Strout,
suggests, balloons.
Emissions controls--carried to extremes--could
prove the most costly and least practical.
Len
.
- References:
- A Modest Proposal
- From: Rand Simberg
- A Modest Proposal
- Prev by Date: Re: A Modest Proposal
- Next by Date: Re: Rocket Planes; How Safe?
- Previous by thread: Re: A Modest Proposal
- Next by thread: Re: A Modest Proposal
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|