Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Wed, 07 Mar 2007 21:49:44 GMT
On Wed, 07 Mar 2007 14:42:37 -0700, in a place far, far away, Joe
Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
In article <1173302506.520308.59620@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Geoffrey A. Landis" <geoffrey.landis@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Where are these rumors? It seems highly unlikely to me; a mission to an
asteroid would almost certainly cost substantially more than a lunar
mission. (Yes, the delta-V may be slightly less in some cases, but the
trip times are substantially longer, which will dominate the costs, not
to mention the risks.)
This is not at all clear. The lander for an asteroid mission would be
trivial, and as you note, the delta-V may be less, and possibly much
less. The trip times may be longer, but simple duration is pretty
easy; we've had astronauts on Space Station for over a year. So it
could be a nice mission.
Yeah, but the CEV is not the Space Station. How long do you think you
could support astronauts in that?
Attach a Bigelow inflatable module to it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: liberalhere
- Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- References:
- Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: are
- Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: Geoffrey A. Landis
- Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- From: Joe Strout
- Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- Prev by Date: Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- Next by Date: Re: Asteroid/Earth collision and SDI. A connection ?
- Previous by thread: Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- Next by thread: Re: Value of Manned Visit to an Asteroid
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|