Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:10:17 GMT
On 11 Mar 2007 08:58:09 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Ian Parker"
<ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
On 11 Mar, 14:48, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On 11 Mar 2007 07:33:21 -0700, in a place far, far away, "Ian Parker"
<ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
The Shuttle is/was a molloch that never worked the way NASA said it
would and gradually took up a greater proportion of resources. A lot
of unmanned exploration was cancelled because of the Shuttle. It
cannot be denied that science today would be more advanced if the
Shuttle had never been built.
Sure it can. Shuttle has very little to do with science. If the
Shuttle hadn't been built, there's no reason to think the savings
would have gone to science.
If you look you will find that projects were specifically cancelled to
pay for Shuttle repairs and overuns.
And absent the Shuttle program, those projects might not have ever
existed in the first place.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- References:
- Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Mike Rhino
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- From: Ian Parker
- Long Overdue - A space robot
- Prev by Date: Re: Vision of the three Rs: Regular, Reliable and Reusable
- Next by Date: Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- Previous by thread: Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- Next by thread: Re: Long Overdue - A space robot
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|