Re: SpaceX

From: Joe Strout <joe@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 20:16:12 -0600

In article <Kw0Mh.129645$_73.25745@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Craig Fink <WeBeGood@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

FALCON DemoFlight 1* Q1 2006 Falcon 1 Kwajalein
+0
FALCON DemoFlight 2 Q1 2007 Falcon 1 Kwajalein
+0
OSD/NRL Q3 2007 Falcon 1 Kwajalein
-1
ATSB (Malaysia) Q4 2007 Falcon 1 Kwajalein
+1
US Government Q2 2008 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
-1
MDA Corp (Canada) Q2 2008 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
+1
NASA ? Demo 1 Q3 2008 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
-1
SpaceDev Q1 2009 Falcon 1 Vandenberg
+1
NASA ? Demo 2 Q2 2009 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
-1
MDA Corp (Canada) Q3 2009 Falcon 1 Vandenberg
+1
NASA ? Demo 3 Q3 2009 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
-1
Swedish Space Corp Q4 2009 Falcon 1 Vandenberg
+1
Bigelow Aerospace Q3 2010 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein
+1 = ????????

Mostly negative, with a plan to end up positive.

OK, I give. I see this is the SpaceX launch manifest, but what do the
numbers represent?
.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SpaceX
  - From: Craig Fink

References:
- SpaceX
  - From: Craig Fink

Prev by Date: SpaceX
Next by Date: Re: Falcon first stage finished
Previous by thread: SpaceX
Next by thread: Re: SpaceX
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Relevant Pages

SpaceX
... US Government Q2 2008 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein ... SpaceDev Q1 2009 Falcon 1 Vandenberg ... Swedish Space Corp Q4 2009 Falcon 1 Vandenberg ... Bigelow Aerospace Q3 2010 Falcon 9 Cape/Kwajalein ...
(sci.space.policy)
Re: SpaceX Launch Update
... Falcon 1 has been removed from its hangar and erected on the launch ... is competing with the delayed NASA ST-5 Pegasus for range ... will be flying from Vandenberg while Falcon will be flying ...
(sci.space.policy)
Re: A disgusting secret deal
... >Falcon wrote: ... Everyone should know the kind of concessions the British ... >> how 'fit for government' the IRA is. ...
(soc.culture.irish)
Re: Falcon 1 Fire Caused by "Procedural Error"
... Had Falcon I been launched from its pad in Vandenberg, ... debris have landed? ...
(sci.space.policy)