Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy. The sun converts energy to mass and not mass to energy.

On 23 Mar 2007 09:47:30 -0700, bradguth@xxxxxxxxx wrote:

On Mar 23, 7:36 am, dan@@pixelphase.com wrote:
On 23 Mar 2007 06:01:36 -0700, bradg...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:


Is there a universal nullification center or core element (possibly of
antimatter) that's actually better than any black hole?

But arnt there many other universes of larger or smaller stature to
behold?

I think that there is one endless universe. It is always expanding,
its density is not changing. Its mass, energy and number of galaxies
is increasing.



What about antimatter; of how much and of where does it coexist?

This theory suggests that new matter is created inside the stars. When
new matter is created it is in pair of matter and antimatter, for
instance, electron and positron. The matter is later annihilating
antimatter using the unequal symmetry between matter and antimatter.

But as far as we know, antimatter can only safely coexist with
photons, such as the core of a given black hole as being safely
surrounded by all of those nearly resting photons.

The high energy collisions of particles in the sun core create
antimatter that coexist temporarly with matter.




Outside of gravity, what's the binding or perhaps buffer/repulsion
energy of a given solar system, or that of a moon in relationship to
its planet or binary other?

The stars also obey the Meissner effect and they repel each other.
This is way main sequence stars never collide.

At what +/- point is a given star not worthy of a "main sequence"
rating?

Neutron stars, white dwarfs, and red giants are not main sequence.

Are the Sirius-a and Sirius-b each of "main sequence" worthy stars?

Sirius-a is main sequence.
Sirius-b is not main sequence.


Our star/sol is a somewhat of a wussy star, and hardly worthy of what
the binary or trinary star systems seem to have going in their favor.

At some point, isn't Sirius-b going to eat Sirius-a alive, and
subsequently nuke our very existence in as little as 8.6 years from
the time of their mutual implosion?

Sirius-a rotates very fast so it is incresing the spead of Sirius-b by
gravitational tides. They are not going to collide.

How can two if not three (perhaps four if including sol) such entirely
different stars coexist forever?

Hasn't our wussy little solar system always been under the master
gravity command and/or energy influence of the nearby Sirius star/
solar system that nearly 3 fold more massive than our realm?

Sirius is too far.


Is there something other more powerful than the combined gravity
influence of the Sirius star/solar system that has each of us within
its ever expanding AI/(God like) grip?
-
Brad Guth
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: The sun energy source is not nuclear fusion, but magnetic fields from the center of the Galaxy.
    ... antimatter) that's actually better than any black hole? ... This theory suggests that new matter is created inside the stars. ... The stars also obey the Meissner effect and they repel each other. ... Hasn't our wussy little solar system always been under the master ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Eotvos: Une questionne pour le Oncle du Al
    ... You might be right about scale and antimatter verses matter has got to ... our universe, without all the violations that are now so relied on to be ... has some residual anti gravity or what works like an anti gravity ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravitation at Angstrom scales
    ... > you the equivalence principle for matter. ... Case 3 says the mass has positive ... > the gravitational polarity of antimatter. ... > be to stop people from comparing gravity to electricity. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: How do we know antimatter has POSITIVE mass?
    ... | QFT both suggest that like matter, antimatter has positive energy. ... acceleration due to a gravity of a negative ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: Gravitation at Angstrom scales
    ... >> you the equivalence principle for matter. ... gravitational mass and a negative inertial mass. ... If antimatter does have antigravity properties, ... >> be to stop people from comparing gravity to electricity. ...
    (sci.physics)