Re: The destruction of NASA




"jacob.navia" <jacob@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4618a843$0$25918$ba4acef3@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
If the mission goes beyond its objectives this is good news.
It means that NASA doesn't have to invest a single penny more to get
science results from those machines. All the investment is already done:
rocket for launch, rover development,construction,testing, etc. The only
cost is now the cost of getting more science from the machines already
in place!

This isn't just a "harmless delay". Team has schrunk so badly that now the
number of photos and measurements done with the robots is just a
few percentage of what it could be if the team would be bigger. Spirit
and Opportunity are sending less than 10 photographs back each day,
compared to 100 when the mission started.

The rovers have been one of the most successful missions of NASA since
Apollo. The lack of money for those missions is just an absolute lack of
foresight.

These rovers are slow and getting slower due to some hardware degradation.
Taking hundreds of photos of the same area you took pictures of last week is
a bit pointless. Not much new science in that. Same goes for the
instruments like the rock grinders. They no doubt suffer from abrasion
against the rocks they're testing and since the rovers can't move very far,
testing more rocks isn't very likely to yield results of great scientific
value.

NASA doesn't like to cut funding off abruptly for projects like this, but
they do tend to let it slack off when the science returns aren't terribly
exciting anymore. Eventually, you've got to have people working on the next
generation of probes and manned missions.

Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)


.



Relevant Pages

  • NASA Unveils $17.6 Billion Budget
    ... NASA UNVEILS $17.6 BILLION BUDGET ... Dale noted steady progress with NASA's missions, ... NASA has 55 science missions currently in space, ...
    (sci.space.news)
  • Re: NASA gets SGI 2048-core Itanium 2 supercomputer
    ... But NASA has changed ... much science at all in the American space program. ... JPL does most of the deep space missions, ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: NASA gets SGI 2048-core Itanium 2 supercomputer
    ... NASA has transformed from the premier engineering organisation that ... engineering and science. ... JPL does most of the deep space missions, ... every other NASA installation (JPL ...
    (comp.os.vms)
  • Re: Deep Impact Kicks Off Fourth of July with Deep Space Fireworks
    ... him to carve a statue from an entire mountain. ... We are talking science ... The apolitical engineers don't realize that NASA ... > as well as their ability to interpret reality. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • comparing VSE to a "many small missions" program
    ... Challenges, commercial ISS resupply, and robotic lunar scout missions, ... that the VSE takes an average of $8 billion per year starting now to ... - Leave the planetary science, astronomy, Earth science, and other NASA ... chance of cost overrun - Does the program contain risks that can result ...
    (sci.space.policy)

Loading