Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: "Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)" <mooregr_deleteth1s@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2007 12:28:03 GMT
"Sylvia Else" <sylvia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:46309849$0$5749$afc38c87@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
60-80 years implies a significant and sustained acceleration, and a good
fraction of the speed of light at the turnover point. Do we have anything,
even in concept, that will do that?
Remember, the original poster was positing tech 100 years from now.
So the answer is "not yet, but maybe by then."
Sylvia.
--
Greg Moore
SQL Server DBA Consulting Remote and Onsite available!
Email: sql (at) greenms.com http://www.greenms.com/sqlserver.html
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- References:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Greg D. Moore \(Strider\)
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Prev by Date: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by Date: Re: Send your playlist to space with ATV! (Forwarded)
- Previous by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Index(es):