Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis <jimdavis2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 18:10:39 +0200 (CEST)
Rand Simberg wrote:
What survival value did other religions have that this one
wouldn't?
Other religions didn't have an obligation to "go to other
planets to find extra-terrestrial life".
That's not what I asked.
I thought that's what you asked. Please clarify since I obviously
didn't understand.
And it's not even true, in the
broadest sense. The LDS believe that if they follow their
doctrine, they'll each get their own planet.
They also believe that American Indians are descendants of Hebrew
settlers of the Western Hemisphere.
It doesn't seem
to have held them back.
It doesn't seem to have moved them forward either. I don't know of
any LDS who actually *has* their own planet.
Perhaps they should reexamine their doctrines?
Jim Davis
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Pat Flannery
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- References:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Hop David
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Prev by Date: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by Date: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Previous by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|