Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Pat Flannery <flanner@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 22:55:45 -0500
Jim Davis wrote:
I repeat. I know of no Mormons that actually have their own planets. Since you raised having their own planet as a criteria for success I feel justified in actually judging them by it.
Perhaps Mormons do have their own planets and it has escaped my attention. Please feel free to fill me in on what I missed.
In my copy of "The Book Of Mormon" they have a great painting of the siege that occurs on a huge Babylon-sized city in North America.
Oddly, even though we've done archeological excavations all through North America, we haven't turned up the ruins of some huge Babylon-sized city.
If I didn't know better, I'd think Rand was a Mormon.
And maybe I don't know better. :-)
Pat
.
- References:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Hop David
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Jim Davis
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Prev by Date: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by Date: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Previous by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Next by thread: Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|