Re: New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- From: Alex Terrell <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Apr 2007 03:35:46 -0700
On 26 Apr, 14:01, "Paul F. Dietz" <d...@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Sylvia Else wrote:The above could be seen as in line with Catholic doctrine.
Perhaps we need to start a religion focused on going to other planets to
find extra-terrestrial life.
I'd be amused to see a religion that took evolution not only
as a fact, but as god's plan, and derived a dogma around it.
Kind of a combination of Calvinism and Social Darwinism.
It's your fate and duty to properly express your genome so
selection can act on it.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- References:
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- From: Sylvia Else
- New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- From: Paul F. Dietz
- Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable
- Prev by Date: Re: The End Of The Stick?
- Next by Date: Space motivations (was: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- Previous by thread: Re: New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- Next by thread: Re: New religions (was Re: Distant planet judged possibly habitable)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|