Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Jonathan Goff <jongoff@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 7 May 2007 10:12:44 -0700
Joe,
But to answer your question, yes, aircraft which make parabolic flights,
producing up to 30 sec or so of free fall, are providing equivalent
services. If you can make a coherent argument as to why Zero-G's
service is NOT equivalent, let's hear it. (I'll wait a couple days
before killfiling you again, just in case.) Otherwise, please buzz off,
and take your typical kneejerk reaction to argue against anyone says
somewhere else.
While Derek may be a bit contrarian, he's usually educational, and
quite
often right. Just because he asks uncomfortable questions doesn't
mean
that he should be killfiled.
That said, I think in this case you could make a strong case that the
Zero-G service is an "equivalent commercial service".
~Jon
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- References:
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Glen Overby
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- From: Joe Strout
- Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- Prev by Date: Re: Moonlab - could the SIVB be used to put a Skylab on the Moon?
- Next by Date: Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- Next by thread: Re: NASA competes with Private Enterprise?
- Index(es):