Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Ian Parker <ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 May 2007 07:06:03 -0700
I wish people would read through the references. The two senators in
question are definitely cited. Their fate is in many ways irrelevant.
Their deaths were clearly intended. A lot of other people are dead.
A long time ago when I was working for a small company on pattern
recognition for a hold baggage scanning system, there was talk about
blowing a plane up. Then people would sit up and take notice. I always
changed the subject, but ever since then I have had a wariness about
the security industry. Dirty tricks do sometimes happen. However on
reading the references through, they are by the way the best
references, others are simply making a political point. On careful
ready I have come to a different conclusion. Security man is certainly
not to be trusted but in this case I think the culprits were in the
Religious Right. Dr. Hatfill BTW is completely innocent and the FBI
was simply trying to find a culprit.
Reading through the investigation it is clear that there is certainly
a cover up. I believe the authorities know, or have a pretty good
idea, about who did it. No other major criminal investigation whether
terrorist or ordinary crime has ever been conducted in so dilatory a
manner.
America has brought the tragedy on itself because it had become a nation of abortionists, sodomites and >pornographers.
No you did not say that, it was Pat Robertson immediately after 9/11.
In Britain we now have laws about the glorification of terrorism -
What pray was that? It seems to me to be very much an invitation for
people to create their own 9/11. Pat also made remarks about Katrina,
at least that was not a man made event. I think the key to the mystery
is the fact, recently brought to light that the notes were written by
a child. The CIA does dirty work but does not employ children. "If
mummy had had an abortion you would not be here - write this letter".
This seems to me to be one stage worse than a jihadic madrassa. At
least you have to be a teenager to be recruited for terrorism. BTW
while Pat Robertson was sounding off the American Islamic Society (now
has a woman as president) was the model of propriety.
Could the FBI find the real culprit? It could if it really wanted to.
If I were in the FBI I would pose as a candidate for interview. I
would have a cup of coffee and talk about Cézanne who pointed the Mont
St.Victoire many times. There is a small museum there where it gives
the geological history of the mountain. If anyone disagreed with the
official Société Géologique de France view point, which I would
expound, their names would be noted and what they were doing and what
they were supposed to have been doing at the relevant times
investigated. There is a finite number of labs. It should not be
difficult to pin someone down.
Suppose this view is right, where does this leave GWB? He has always
been identified with the Religious Right. At the very least it would
be a considerable embarrassment, more of an embarrassment than a
direct CIA involvement.
I have also come to the conclusion that people do not want to discover
the truth. They are in the business of discrediting individuals. In
this regard what I said about warp drive is highly relevant. These
things are put there to prevent people fining out about what really is
going on. As I say if they really had produced an antigravity device
it would be curtains for all of us.
I think it is a great pity that people are unwilling to discuss the
original subject which is quite interesting. Nuclear explosions,
conventional explosions in different positions, all very relevant to
providing impulses. Equally relevant though is accurate measurement
and getting the impulse as small as possible. This has not been
discussed.
- Ian Parker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- References:
- NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Mike
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- From: Fred J . McCall
- NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- Prev by Date: Re: Great Griffin/ESAS Discussion At Space Politics
- Next by Date: NASA Spaceflight.com watermarking publically available images and stiking them on their pay only L2 site
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- Next by thread: Re: NASA TRIES, FAILS TO WITHHOLD PLANETARY DEFENSE REPORT
- Index(es):