Re: MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"

From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 21 May 2007 14:44:35 -0400

"gaetanomarano" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1179769529.385934.99180@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I can't call them "artists' concepts" because ALL my articles are NOT
just "a drawing"

an "artist" (simply) draws the things the engineers show him, while,
all my articles are DIFFERENT concepts that engineers can REALLY
develop, build and test

Are you an engineer by degree?

Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)

.

References:
- MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"
  - From: gaetanomarano
- Re: MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"
  - From: Jeff Findley
- Re: MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"
  - From: gaetanomarano

Prev by Date: A true ESAS revolution: the ESAS + COTS + AresX moon missions!!!
Next by Date: Re: A true ESAS revolution: the ESAS + COTS + AresX moon missions!!!
Previous by thread: Re: MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"
Next by thread: Re: MOST RELIABLE Orion's Solar Panels - just FOUR moving parts (in total) vs. 46 parts of the Orion's "Butterfly"
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread