Re: John Young says CEV
- From: "hallerb@xxxxxxx" <hallerb@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 26 May 2007 16:38:26 -0700
On May 26, 5:11�pm, Hop David <h...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Jonathan wrote:
Evidently you have misread Hallerb's statement and Henry's reply. Please
reread them more carefully.
He stated it was unlikely the CEV would be trashed. Which is another way
of saying he believes it's likely the CEV will be built.
Yes, that's a sensible interpretation.
I responded
as if he used the second form
No, you questioned his use of the work "unlikely."
and I was trying to say it's a sure thing
it'll be built since we must have a shuttle replacment.
No, you weren't seconding his opinion, you were disagreeing with him.
Your exact words: "Unlikely? More like a sure thing."
Then later you wrote:
"What you guys don't get is this. When that time comes
if nothing else better/worthwhile is not ready to take the
place of the Vision. Then the entire manned space program
is all but finished from a lack of interest and purpose."
as if you were arguing against someone defending the longevity of Bush's
Vision.
When you improve reading comprehension you'll be better able to assess
what concepts others understand. Until then you are in no position to
tell anyone what they get or don't get.
Hop
nothing is far better than unworkable, unsafe, and unaffordable.
leaves riim for possible private industry
.
- References:
- John Young says CEV
- From: hallerb@xxxxxxx
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: kT
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: gaetanomarano
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: hallerb@xxxxxxx
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: Henry Spencer
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: Jonathan
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: Hop David
- Re: John Young says CEV
- From: Hop David
- John Young says CEV
- Prev by Date: Re: ...This is How Far Nasa has Fallen.....Even I can't believe this....
- Next by Date: Re: Oefelein Reassigned
- Previous by thread: Re: John Young says CEV
- Next by thread: This week's blog Carnival of Space is up
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|