Re: Carbon Dioxide Emissions Three Times Higher Than Expected
- From: "Paul F. Dietz" <dietz@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 07 Jun 2007 21:06:00 -0500
Hop David wrote:
I'd be interested to hear your views on Svensmark's theories.
Very skeptical. In addition to the huge lack of evidence for
most of it, I am troubled that the lack of correlation between
surface neutron measurements and climate is handwaved away by
asserting that the cosmic rays that affect climate are a special
higher energy variety. However, proxy measures of ancient cosmic
ray activity that involve cosmogenic isotopes (like 14C or 10Be)
that I would think are mostly produced by the more abundant lower
energy cosmic rays are still used to support the theory.
Paul
.
- References:
- Re: Carbon Dioxide Emissions Three Times Higher Than Expected
- From: Hop David
- Re: Carbon Dioxide Emissions Three Times Higher Than Expected
- Prev by Date: Re: Here We Go Again!
- Next by Date: Re: Gravity
- Previous by thread: Re: Carbon Dioxide Emissions Three Times Higher Than Expected
- Next by thread: Center for Space Plasma and Aeronomy Research (NASA)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
