Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2007 17:34:49 -0000
On Jun 15, 1:13 pm, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Craig Fink <WeBeG...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
:
:I was under the impression that the Gonzales thing has to do with the firing
:of some scape goats over warrentless searches, a violation of the 4th
:Amendment.
:
You're grossly misinformed.
:
:Seems to me that President Bush has shredded the 4th Amendment.
:This latest Gonzales deal and the AT&T wiretapping of the entire Internet
:
'Wiretapping' the internet? The internet doesn't come with any
privacy guarantees, so it's hardly necessary to 'wiretap' it.
:
:have never been fully investigated by the House. It's the House's job, not
:the Senate, they are the ones who do the impeaching. Why is the Senate
:trying to do the House's job?
:
You think the Senate never investigates anything? You ARE grossly
ignorant about government, aren't you?
Unlike yourself, Craig Fink is also not a smart little Zion that'll
put his/her own kind on a stick, for that almighty taking of loot none
the less.
-
"whoever controls the past, controls the future" / George Orwell
-
Brad Guth
.
- References:
- Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- From: PM
- Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- From: Space Balls
- Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- From: Craig Fink
- Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- Prev by Date: Re: Atlas V Falters
- Next by Date: Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- Next by thread: Re: OT: George Bush: An impeachable offence?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|