Re: NASA - National Atmospheric and Space Administration



simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:

:On Fri, 22 Jun 2007 14:32:44 GMT, in a place far, far away, Monte
:Davis <monte.davis@xxxxxxxxxxx> made the phosphor on my monitor glow
:in such a way as to indicate that:
:
:>"hallerb@xxxxxxx" <hallerb@xxxxxxx> wrote:
:>
:>>beyond that all profit from space activities should be declared
:>>federal tax free for 30 years to help investments.
:>>
:>>way better than spending public money.
:>
:>Umm... behind all the handwaving deployed on behalf of everything from
:>sports stadiums to mortgage interest deductibility, foregoing tax
:>revenues *is* precisely the same as spending public money.
:
:Not if it's a foregone tax revenue from an activity that wouldn't have
:otherwise happened. Not saying that's the case here, but "foregoing
:tax revenues" is a slippery topic (similar to the argument about
:supply-side economics). It costs the public nothing to "forego tax
:revenues" if in the absence of such a policy, there would have been no
:revenues to tax.
:

Of course it does. The same reasoning applies to subsidies. If you
subsidize them up front and tax them on the back side, you can make
pretty much precisely the same argument.

Once again, look up 'fungible'. A dollar not collected is precisely
the same as a dollar collected and then given away.


--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: another upstanding Fuckuplican
    ... tax cuts effectively pay for themselves through their stimulus to the ... economy and the corollary increase in tax revenues. ... tax cuts stimulated growth and tax revenue. ...
    (rec.audio.opinion)
  • Re: Dow drops 415 points today -- blood on the trading floor -- tomorrow the slide c
    ... tax revenues in the face of repeated tax cuts. ... Borrowed money is not real revenue. ... in the long run *decrease* income, ... why do you think the number of tax revenue sources ...
    (alt.politics)
  • Re: TK was exactly right. OT
    ... "The critics of the eighties tax policy argue that the top rate ... the income tax revenue collected from the top 10 ... the real tax liability of ... other taxpayers (the bottom 90 percent) declined from $161.8 billion ...
    (rec.bicycles.racing)
  • Re: Killing Bush Tax Cuts Absolutely Wrong Thing to Do
    ... Allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire is absolutely the ... This argument looks at the time period from 1982, the first year of the Reagan tax cut, to 1989 and the income tax cut was significant, a drop from 70% to 28% for the top bracket. ... Of the $373B increase in tax revenue claimed by advocates of the Laffer Curve theory, $161B came from taxes other than the income taxes that Reagan reduced. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: Killing Bush Tax Cuts Absolutely Wrong Thing to Do
    ... Allowing the Bush tax cuts to expire is absolutely the ... This argument looks at the time period from 1982, the first year of the Reagan tax cut, to 1989 and the income tax cut was significant, a drop from 70% to 28% for the top bracket. ... Of the $373B increase in tax revenue claimed by advocates of the Laffer Curve theory, $161B came from taxes other than the income taxes that Reagan reduced. ...
    (soc.retirement)