Moon Landing Hoax/No Hoax?

Most enthusiasts who post their positions on the moon
landing hoax/no-hoax convincingly enough must conclude
that the Apollo program was forced into a state of false
promises while in the Nixon Years, meaning that whether
or not we landed on the moon became secondary to the fact that
there was new (or old, depending on how you look at it)
technology that would make Apollo look like the Phoenicians
arriving in South America to meet Captain Kirk on the holodeck.

What we strove to achieve in the Apollo years was more about
the technical communication that managers and supervisors had
with each other than actual territorial gain. Whether or not
we landed on the moon is almost a moot issue, because we really
would have not gained anything by going THERE, now would we?
In fact, I think that the art of UFO technologies were already
well advanced enough to go just about anywhere in the nearby
tens of parsecs region, owing to FTL travel. However, this was
also not exclusively creating pathways to the stars, but
inadvertantly causing a dimensional shift when traveling BACK
to the earth. The only way space travel of this magnitude can
remain "unaffected" by the time dilation is to make the return
trip back in time to just a few days after "originally"
leaving. Even though a proof exists for the Physics/Technologically
inclined, all challenges to the current views of the already
antiquated "theory of relativity" have defined away all
challenges by the mob mentality, or "brute force" method.
Why? Because the antiquated "theory of relativity" is the
only reliable method by which the Supreme Court could draw a
distinction without a difference - in suggesting that only
someone who is as intelligent as Einstein himself can see if
the "antiquated" theory of relativity is, by example, a
"counterfeit" theory. - That's LICENSED opinion - a not-so-
scientific angle that warrants a challenge into the department
of NASA's dwindling resources for advanced technology,
albeit private interests might also be at stake here -
but for whom? (IMHO private industry is probably MORE
informed about advanced propulsion technology than even NASA)
- but can you hear the giant sucking sound of NASA stealing
or blocking the show? (I can)

The truth is, we taxpayers are losing, or have
COMPLETELY LOST our representation with even the Supreme
Court in the sense that we've been "injured" in our capacity
as taxpayers. There is an unconstitutionality of the
exercises of congressional power under the taxing and
spending clause of Art. I, S. 8 of the Constitution, but
not subject to geopolitical redress of Article 4, S.3,
clause 2, regarding the property clause which states,
"Congress has no power to give or authorize leases."
Undoubtedly, interstellar space is in a completely
different territory.

At the same time, NASA's legal argument has defined
their current launch territories to be respective of
any type of Apollo-era technology, which they use to
mathematically exception-barr any new, revolutionary
technology that may come down the pike for review.
The current military-industrial complex holds such a
tight grip on the reign of our bureaucracy that there
can be no business match for revolutionary energy
technology outside of U-238 nuclear and oil. (All those
alternatives like corn, solar, windmills, etc., don't
amount to anything that could replace our current
fixation on nuke plants or oil) Yet there simply is
NO SUPREME COURT DISSENTION on this at all!


American

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How not to design a Shuttle.
    ... > on the moon now - except to stay. ... That's more or less what Apollo, ... But the technology and program management did live on, ... With a slow development and no Gemini-Apollo would a Shuttle or some similar ...
    (sci.space.history)
  • Re: Moon Landing Hoax/No Hoax?
    ... American wrote: ... technology that would make Apollo look like the Phoenicians ... spending clause of Art. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Moon Landing Hoax/No Hoax?
    ... American wrote: ... technology that would make Apollo look like the Phoenicians ... spending clause of Art. ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Abandoned Spaceships
    ... Apollo 17 commander: "Glad to see old Rover's still ... "Rover," the moon buggy, sat outside with no one in the driver's seat, ... recognizable images of Apollo relics since 1972. ... The spacecraft's high-resolution camera, called "LROC," short for Lunar ...
    (sci.space.news)
  • Re: Books on space program and moon landing
    ... I enjoyed Andrew Chaikin's A Man on the Moon tremendously. ... you get used to reading a book while suspended by a crane, ... didn't show you on "Apollo 13", this book will go into the details. ... Astronauts, but I can't recall which one that was. ...
    (sci.space.history)