Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- From: Ian Parker <ianparker2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2007 01:29:41 -0700
On 21 Jul, 20:26, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:not necessarily. What you do is measure reaction speeds in a variety
:
:I feel too that in the development proram a great deal of reliance has
:to be placed on simulation. This means that reliable models of
:combustion in all conditions is needed. I assume that is what ESTEC is
:trying to do. It is just too expensive to keep on building actual
:aircraft and tweaking them
:
You also can't build good simulations for something that you don't
have measurements for. So, at the very least, they will need
hypersonic wind tunnel data on various designs in order to build a
simulation such as you propose.
That's not cheap, either.
of conditions. In your simulation, which is done on a grid, you know
how much fuel and oxygen there is at every point in the grid and what
the temperature and pressure is. You start at a fairly fundamental
level and then move on. What you do is create shock waves using either
expolosives or an electrical discharge.
- Ian Parker
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- References:
- Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- From: Sylvia Else
- Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- Prev by Date: Re: Yet Another Roswell Thread
- Next by Date: Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- Previous by thread: Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- Next by thread: Re: Sabre engine - pressure ratio issues
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|