Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- From: "Jeff Findley" <jeff.findley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Aug 2007 14:16:34 -0400
"Jim Kingdon" <kingdon@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:p4wvebjtjj8.fsf@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.aiaa-houston.org/horizons
Thanks for posting this link. The articles there look pretty
interesting.
Indeed. I especially liked the article about the training that Virgin
Galactic held for travel agents. I hadn't heard about that event
before.
The article on the Direct (Jupiter) launch vehicle (family) was interesting
as well. I still don't support any new NASA developed launch vehicle, but
the Direct launch vehicle approach does seem to have a few advantages. It
seems to minimize initial launch vehicle development costs and schedule by
keeping the four segment SRB's and having the liquid fueled first stage be
the same diameter as the existing ET. Because it has more in common with
the STS stack it maximizes reuse of shuttle facilities. And finally, it
would give NASA a launch vehicle family with fewer variations (hardware and
work-flow)between them than Ares I + Ares V.
Jeff
--
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a
little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor
safety"
- B. Franklin, Bartlett's Familiar Quotations (1919)
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- From: gaetanomarano
- Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- References:
- DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- From: Jon
- Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- From: Jeff Findley
- Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- From: Jim Kingdon
- DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- Prev by Date: Re: Just in Time
- Next by Date: Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- Previous by thread: Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- Next by thread: Re: DIRECT launcher article in AIAA Houston Horizons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|