DON'T LOSE time and money around the fusion energy illusion and the lunar-helium-3 dream!!!



+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++

I think that fusion energy researches are a GIANT WASTE of TIME and
MONEY (several Billion$$$ so far) since the (cold/hot/semi-hot) fusion
is ONLY a scientific curiosity that NEVER will have any commercial
applications, NOT EVEN if a fusion machine will (finally!) reach a
stable, "self-sustained" reaction, because we DON'T NEED any fusion
reactor AT ALL as explained in this article:

http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/003moonhelium.html

At the (enbarrassing) scenario of the (failed) fusion research, now,
somebody (scientists, newspapers, space forums, etc.) have added the
"Lunar Helium-3" factor/dream/illusion (something like the lunar
poles' water...) despite it's ONLY a THEORY so far, since there is NO
EVIDENCE that our moon hides a so giant He3 treasure!

There are only some scientits who "believe" that... 1. the He3 from
the Sun STILL is on the moon surface, after BILLIONS years... 2.
millions meteorites crashed on the moon have just "disseminated" the
He3 on the surface rather than (as appears more logical) SLINGED this
very light element in Space... 3. then, we can (really) find ONE
million tons of He3 on the moon!

Then, they "believe" that, mining tons of Lunar-He3 and bring them to
earth, will be "so easy and cheap" that He3-He3 energy could WIN on
prices against oil, methane, coal, nuclear, hydro, wind, solar,
biofuels and geothermal energy!!!

well, just to inform them... EACH moon mission will cost (at least) $9
billion (including the shared R&D and fixed costs) to bring back to
earth LESS THAN 100 kg. of moon rocks at a price of $90,000,000.oo per
kg.!!!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
++++

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: DONT LOSE time and money around the fusion energy illusion and the lunar-helium-3 dream!
    ... MONEY since the fusion ... EVIDENCE that our moon hides a so giant He3 treasure! ... will be "so easy and cheap" that He3-He3 energy could WIN on ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: UN Warns of Biofuels Environmental Risk
    ... The first space flight didn't reach the moon, ... You mean MAN hasn't been to another planet. ... Helium 3 is a GREAT fuel for fusion reactors, ... power plants using fusion energy has been theoretical. ...
    (misc.transport.trucking)
  • Re: Helium-3, China, and the Moon
    ... > "China will make a manned moon landing at a proper time, around 2017," ... > End quote> ... > the ideal source of power -- energy with very low neutron production. ... > such advantage over "conventional" fusion. ...
    (sci.energy)
  • Re: Amazing facts from NASA
    ... Helium-3 *is* a good fuel for fusion energy. ... that we should leave it on the Moon, as it is efficient for use in ... As others have noted, though, we don't have fusion power yet, and we ...
    (sci.space.policy)