Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Alex Terrell <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 00:39:04 -0700
On 18 Sep, 15:51, Jim Kingdon <king...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If they really could do 2000 lbs to LEO, what does that translate to
the moon?
Depends on what kind of upper stage and landing equipment, but I've
always used a factor of 7 as a rule of thumb. So 2000 / 7 would be
285 lb to the lunar surface.
About 6 with LOX/LH2 and about 7.5 with LOX/Kerosene seems possible.
LOX / Kerosene will be much more cost effective, especially for large
scale efforts involving multiple launches. That's why NASA's gone for
LOX/LH2.
BTW - I don't think a pure solid rocket could get any meaningful
payload even to orbit. Certainly not a single stage solid.
.
- References:
- Doin it cheap
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Jorge R. Frank
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Derek Lyons
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Frogwatch
- Re: Doin it cheap
- From: Jim Kingdon
- Doin it cheap
- Prev by Date: Re: Doin it cheap
- Next by Date: Re: Solar powered lasers in space
- Previous by thread: Re: Doin it cheap
- Next by thread: Re: Doin it cheap
- Index(es):