Re: Village in a box

On Sep 20, 12:39 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 18, 12:05 pm, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:



These domes and so forth can also be fitted into existing cities and
towns and villages - and used as seems appropriate - to improve living
conditions.

I for one see all kinds of positive/constructive logic within those
artificial biosphere alternatives, as to affordably resolving some of
our worse situations as directly caused by way of our very own doings,
and obviously on behalf of our surviving upon most other worlds near
or far.

As you can tell from the lack of replies, there's no viable Usenet
agreement or even so much as a fuzzy focus on behalf of salvaging the
badly failing environment of Earth from humanity, whereas most of
anything that's renewable and of squeaky clean energy is being
systematically stalked, bashed and otherwise summarily treated as
taboo/nondisclosure worthy, if not becoming entirely banished.

If them silly Yids and their faith-based minions of such brown-nosed
clowns can't manage to convert you, they'll simply take to their
tactic of ignoring your informative topics, especially once they've
run out of those brown-nosed minion clowns for giving your topics as
much naysayism and/or bashings worth of grief as they can muster.

It's as though we've been invaded by those kinds of pesky ETs that
have their swarm like mindset agenda, whereas such they're deeply in
charge of calling all the mainstream status quo shots. And, it's not
jut yourself or my deductive thinking that's getting the full force of
their naysayism, as much as they apply the same to each and every new
usenet contributor that doesn't quite understand whom is in charge of
the past, present and future.
- Brad Guth -

Lots of madness there Brad. I did sign a huge deal in Jakarta August
2006, and got funding in September 2006 - and started work. I came
back to NYC and got interviewed by WSJ and NYT reporters - and met
with many US banks and investment houses. I had a fun week in NY -
thought I was on top of the world.

When the articles did not appear, the banks and investment houses
wrote me off as a crank. It was only European and Middle East banks
that supported the funding - and so that's the way we went.

Thing is, nothing appeared in the press. Don't know why. The
reporters were upset, but in the end, they went on to assignments that
would give them paper space. You claim to know all the reasons. I
claim nothing. Maybe it was bad karma. Who knows? All I know, is I
invent a golf ball that changes color in 1991 and sell a few $100,000
worth of them and I get a 1/3 page article in NYT. Meanwhile I do a
multi-billion dollar energy deal in Jakarta that has potential to
change the way this planet uses energy - and there were NO reports -
not even to amusing or dismissive or anecdotal reports. You know you
can never control what the press says, so, even if they were
dismissive they couldn't deny a deal was done.. but there was nothing
- which I found exceptionally strange. I've written dozens of press
releases and I've always gotten press. Sometimes good, sometimes bad,
but never nothing. After all, newsmen exist to write newspaper
articles - and if they spend a half day interviewing someone and doing
the leg work to check them out - they sure as hell will write
SOMETHING! and they did. But their editors decided not to run it -
not even suggest to drop this or accentuate that. Just drop it. At
TWO newspapers. I will tell you, if a newsperson spends a day
talking and a week researching and ultimately writes an article - they
will not give up a story lightly. And if it was me, I will tell you,
they'd call me and give me an earful! haha. But that didn't happen.
It just disappeared into the vast memory slot and was gone.

You just gotta laugh.

http://sci.tech-archive.net/Archive/sci.space.policy/2006-10/msg00586.html

Again, I don't know WHY this happened. I really don't. And neither
do you Brad - but it is interesting. The only thing to do is to just
keep on keeping on and do the best you can.


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Village in a box
    ... Lots of madness there Brad. ... and got funding in September 2006 - and started work. ... back to NYC and got interviewed by WSJ and NYT reporters - and met ... When the articles did not appear, ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: What is the point?
    ... I don't care about the articles more what people think. ... Do reporters that are sited have a bias or are they just ... What you can do though is work to find the most reputable sources of ... Arabic growing beards and trying on birkas. ...
    (alt.politics.bush)
  • Should Gitmo Be Used for Those Who Raped and Pillaged our Economy?
    ... reporters for the Seattle Post-Intelligencer are reporting ... the FBI knew that home mortgage scams were being ... perpetrated by banks all across the country. ... Republicans who changed laws reaching back to the Republican Great ...
    (misc.news.internet.discuss)
  • Re: The =?UTF-8?B?wqMxNywwMDAgbG9hbiB0aGF0IG1vdW50ZWQgaW50byBhIGQ=?= =?UTF-8?B?ZWJ0IG9mIMKjM
    ... in alleging that I only post articles from them. ... Considering the extent of State control over the banks, it is surprising that they are as successful as they are. ... It's very easy to do a "wicked banks" headline on that, yet totally ignore the fact that going overdrawn seventy times in a year, and then blaming the banks for that, possibly indicates a problem with the customer's perception of what their current account is there for. ...
    (uk.finance)
  • Re: Including New Tables in an Existing Publication
    ... I think you would be best to create a new publication to distribute these ... new snapshot of all the articles. ... "Brad M." wrote in message ... >> databases wirelessly to receive new jobs, as well as submit field tickets ...
    (microsoft.public.sqlserver.replication)
Loading