Re: A SERIOUS EPISODE OF CENSORSHIP !!!

On Sep 22, 4:33 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
.

A SERIOUS EPISODE OF CENSORSHIP !!!

I know that just a few peoples like my ideas, proposals and opinions
while other peoples dislike them, but, I'm sure that, BOTH peoples,
WANT their countries will ALWAYS have DEMOCRACY and FREEDOM and nobody
likes that Google does in USA, Europe, etc. the same things it does in
China for business (if you don't know what, just search more info
googling...).

TWO years ago I've invented (and published on my website and several
space forums and blogs) the idea of a Moonrovers Prize competition:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/moonprize/moonprize.html

Then, I've (also) sent dozens emails to websites, newspapers and big
companies to propose my idea, and that emails included one to Google
(that I still have with the files of "mail read" replies).

So, when Google has announced "its" ("original") "Lunar X Prize", I've
published two articles on my ghostNASA.com blog (hosted by
Bravenet.com) including the mail sent to Google, as evidence of the
TRUTH.

But, last Sept. 21, Bravenet, that seems be a Google's partner (like
half world...) has SUSPENDED my website (that's now inaccesible) and
(worst!) has DELETED my Bravenet account (and a PAID web hosting) so I
can't access to my three domains (two of them now inactive) to move
them to another server in Italy or Europe or Russia or India or
wherever there is NOT that censorship.

Well, until I'll have back my domains and put them on another server,
I want your help, since, what happened to me to-day, could happen
tomorrow TO YOU or to every FREE peoples that want to publish their
opinion without be CENSORED by BIG companies that believe they can do
everything they wants!!!

I'm posting this message on as many as possible forums and blogs (and
send to newspapers and websites) all over the world, but, of course, I
can't reach all them, so, if you have a website, a forum, a blog (or
write on other blogs/forums/websites/newspapers) please post this full
message on them to allow peoples know WHAT Google and/or Bravenet have
done!

Thank You

Gaetano Marano

Until I'll have my blog again, you can download a .pdf file with all
blog's articles (including those about the Google's "original" lunar
prize) clicking this link:

http://www.datafilehost.com/download.php?file=85344279

PS - If you'll experience any problem to download the .pdf file,
please send a mail to me, so, I'll put it on another server (and
another, another, another... if necessary) and its link on my
website's home page:

http://www.gaetanomarano.it/

.

You call it a "SERIOUS EPISODE OF CENSORSHIP", whereas I call it
mainstream damage control on behalf of insider spooks and moles
covering thy butts and of protecting those in charge as having the
most to lose, which means giving credits to anyone outside of their
cult is simply not a viable option. All it takes is a few of those
insiders in order to make such dastardly things happen is why 99.9% of
GOOGLE need not be involved or know a damn thing.

Because you originally proposed and promoted the notions of an X Prize
for accomplishing our moon is actually the kind of proof that you're
at least entitled to some credit by name, if not by some degree of
other rewards. However, what you fail to realize is that our moon has
never been robotic rover accomplished by other than hard-landings of
those semi-impact probes that accomplished very little if any roving
and having shared much less than the whole truth and nothing but the
truth.

There has not even been a sustained moon L1 science platform of any
kind, much less of such having shared the day to day and night to
night truths about our physically naked, dark and nasty moon that's
somewhat salty and very much unavoidably gamma and X-ray reactive
(anticathode like, especially via those higher density surface
deposits), that's also double IR hot by day and otherwise cold enough
by night to cause Radon gas to liquify. Even though impact probe
technology has existed for decades, there's nothing of hard science
about the relative low density core of that unusually pulverised moon
that seemingly took 99% of those meteorite hits on our behalf, that
which should have by now been well enough 3D mapped to show us where
those most likely hollow portions might exist, and of how deep and/or
extensive those interior voids are.

In other words, we know almost nothing first hand about our cosmic
traumatised, dusty and somewhat salty old moon, whereas a few soft-
landing accomplished rovers should at least start sharing the surface
related truths, of which China or perhaps India stand the best
economics per launched kg of making that happen.

Haven't you ever taken any open mindset of any one on one notice, as
to how much darker and rather nasty deep golden brownish that fully
solar illuminated moon actually is, such as obtained within the very
exact same FOV relationship as to having included mother Earth that's
not even half as bright as Venus would have been depicted.
http://www.lpi.usra.edu/resources/apollo/
There are actually many other examples within those Apollo archives,
as well as more than a few others contributed ever since, that is if
you'd care to look, which proves that Venus and a few other off-moon
items should have been unavoidably included in such unfiltered Kodak
moments. In addition to hard photographic science, any fully
interactive 3D orbital simulator will more than prove this out.

Though Venus was always a much smaller crescent item to have included,
its nearly three fold brightness to that of Earth, and of what such an
unfiltered Kodak moment should have easily recorded with dynamic range
to spare, is simply further proof positive that our rad-hard
astronauts never set any official moonboot on that physically dark and
nasty moon of ours.

There's simply no freaking way that any of those NASA/Apollo EVA
unfiltered Kodak moments were obtained as having been officially
stipulated, and unfortunately for our NASA/Apollo suck-up freaks of
nature, there's so much more of physics and of the best available
science that doesn't add up on behalf of those NASA/Apollo missions.
- Brad Guth -

.

Loading