Re: NASA ESMD Lunar Architecture Update
- From: BradGuth <bradguth@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 12:39:01 -0700
Still interesting, in that as long as I was signed into GOOGLE as
"bradguth" (my real name by the way) I could not even access the
following pdf file without a browser error and total robo-shut-down.
Then subsequently without my having signed in I got into the initial
pdf file window without error, but then nothing of the file ever got
sent to my poor old PC.
http://images.spaceref.com/news/2007/AIAA.ESMD.SPACE.2007.pdf
"An error has occured while trying to use this document"
-
This following link seems to work indirectly on behalf of their
AIAA.ESMD.SPACE.2007.pdf
http://www.space.com/businesstechnology/070920_nasa_moonbase.html
"Cooke and other NASA officials detailed the agency's revised lunar
plan at the Space 2007 Conference of the American Institute of
Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIAA) in Long Beach, California. NASA
aims to return astronauts to the moon by 2020 using its space shuttle
successor -- the Orion Crew Exploration Vehicle and the Ares I booster
-- as well as the Ares V heavy-lift rocket."
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewnews.html?id=1234
Keith Cowing / Friday, September 21, 2007
NASA Revises and Updates Its Lunar Architecture
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=19094
All hype and seriously up hill flowing infomercial crapolla, as in all
hocus-pocus smoke and mirrors and/or simply MOS lies from get to go.
Within "NASA's revised lunar plan", besides their ongoing lack of any
measurable public support or the necessary loot, there's not so much
as an honest word about the local gamma, X-rays, electrostatic dust
that's nearly dark as coal, as well as being crystal dry and fluffy
(meaning least compacted), as more than a bit salty, offering
extremely low surface tension and tens of meters deep in places, or
that of having to defend the naked moonsuit body of frail DNA as not
only from the local, solar and cosmic radiation but also from those
pesky micro and not so micro meteors, or of those unavoidable
secondary impact shards of equally lethal flak. Notice how they do
not mention or much less elaborate upon utilizing the moon's L1 as
their mission essential space depot/gateway.
As per status quo usual, this SPACE.2007.pdf is every bit as hocus-
pocus infomercial worthy of hype spewed crapolla that's so ripe that
it's flowing up hill none the less, as is most everything else
pertaining to our NASA/Apollo moon. It seems as though <http://
images.spaceref.com> as simply another infomercial spewing winglet of
their space.com, is nothing but yet another insider puppet or ghost
document/image server that's only functioning on behalf of the NASA
Yiddish need-to-know Third Reich.
In other words, I'm not the least bit impressed.
- Brad Guth -
.
- References:
- NASA ESMD Lunar Architecture Update
- From: Jeff Findley
- NASA ESMD Lunar Architecture Update
- Prev by Date: Re: Fill'R'Up
- Next by Date: Re: Solar powered lasers in space
- Previous by thread: Re: NASA ESMD Lunar Architecture Update
- Next by thread: Thinking about Chinese strategic thinking about milspace
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|
