Re: 2015



On Sep 30, 4:07 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sep 29, 11:53 am, Willie.Moo...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:





On Sep 29, 1:20 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

If I were in charge,
This is a HUGE statement here Brad. It gives away the insanity at the
root of all your concerns. You are not in charge, but it makes you
feel good to the point of getting a hard-on to say that - just to
utter those words - and think the thought - 'me, brad, in charge' -
haha - You're not in charge and you will never be in charge for good
reason. You are insane. You push away any possibility of you being
in charge with every rant you write. That's why I urge you not to get
on the internet for a year and go out into the world and DO
something. Fall in love, learn a language, travel, learn to play a
musical instrument, volunteer for a worthy cause. In the end maybe
you'll see that you are not in charge of your mental processes and
seek therapy. That will be a red letter day for you and for all of us
who have suffered through your insanities for decades.

The "If I were in charge" is not actually such a HUGE statement, as
for many years I've given it pretty much all its worth several times
over, and apparently you've only but recently noticed. However,
there's an even bigger than HUGE statement to behold, that of lord/
wizard Mook isn't the body and soul of whom we thought, but simply an
all around pretend atheist as well as a certified born-again liar,
whereas I am not either of those or nearly as smart because I don't
even own a copy of that CIA WorldFactBook.

As to lord Mook, and others of your kind, I think that you're all
losing it big time, even though it's a good thing that Western State
as well as a few other mental facilities allow internet access to
their patients, it's still not working. You see, I've checked the
regular internet of DOE, NREL and the US Patent Office for the likes
of William Mook or Willie Moo and anything PV, and low and behold
there's not zip unless you are related to "Herbert A. Mook" or "Bryant
Mook" or perhaps it's Rabbi Mook because otherwise it's someone else
that's getting all the credit for your hard work. Of course within
Usenet few are ever who they say they are, such as a given Rabbi could
pretend to be anything or anyone, and get away with it.

Those smart folks like yourself are here within this mostly Yiddish
usenet land of topic/author stalking, bashings and generalized
banishment via denial and/or continual naysayism only because you
haven't actually done what you say you have done, and that is rather
sad and pathetic because, "If I were in charge" it's those weird and
often smart folks like yourself that would have been getting ahead and
thereby directly benefiting yourself as well as humanity while saving
various aspects of our frail environment at the same time, and all of
that could have been starting as of decades ago, "if I were in
charge".

Since I am a highly deductive, positive/yaysay thinking and thus fully
constructive kind of open mindset caring guy, is why the best of
science and for staying within those regular laws of physics is what I
do best at my having to work within such limits, much the same as your
85% efficient conversion of solar energy into H2 being the case of
what's technically doable, even though the average available solar
energy that reaches the surface of Earth isn't the WorldFactBook 346 w/
m2 unless you're situated within the tropics and well enough elevated
at that. Where I live in Olalla Washington, we'd be lucky to average
250 w/m2, but that's still 250 w/m2 of what's clean and 100%
renewable, of which at 85% conversion is actually still nearly as good
as per what most nuclear energy can boast as their all-inclusive birth
to grave energy density worth. Of course with sunlight or from the
terrific wind that it creates along with those sun and moon gravity/
tidal benefits that can't hardly be ignored, are not causing the kinds
of artificial trauma and long term biological demise as per nuclear
and even fossil derived energy that in places has simply gotten out of
hand.

Not that nature's or God's energy hasn't been extremely lethal to us
humans and our environment from time to time, and not that I'd ever
exclude nuclear derived energy because, perhaps 10% or more of our
global energy demands can and should be derived from nuclear energy,
along with 75% as taken from those clean and renewable resources and
the remainder extracted from various fossil fuels seems perfectly
doable without our having to trash mother Earth in the process, or
having to do without sufficient energy that's affordably safe and
clean. Going off-world is just because we can, and because that too
can derive viable energy alternatives, including clean and renewable
energy that can get into our products and appliances via those SBLs,
that we'll need anyway for dealing with those pesky NEOs that just
will not go away on their own.

Now, what on this flat Earth can yourself or others of your silly kind
find the least bit wrong or out of focus with any of that is clearly
beyond my best deductive reasoning, but then I'm certain that you'll
find something to bitch and whine about no matters what, even if it's
in full agreement with your own ideas and plans. However, if the
likes of Warren Buffett was as incest bigoted as those taking
exception to each and every last word that we few good guys of usenet
have to say, where otherwise than corruption would all of that Buffett
loot have come from if he only took the advise of such faith-based
bully naysayers, and otherwise employed those hateful kinds of folks
that have no intentions of their ever sharing squat, especially if any
of that squat makes someone else (such as their boss) better off?

It seems the absolutely insane one here that's only thinking of
himself or of his offshore bank accounts is the kind of mindset that's
claiming for decades of having all the best answers to our energy
starved problems, whereas I've just been officially unsnookered as of
nearly 8 years ago, and only in the last five of those unsnookered
years giving global energy and our badly polluted environment a fair
dyslexic shot at offering my best deductive science, of how to go
about accomplishing a whole lot better global energy creating and
efficient consumption without summarily trashing our environment, or
that of getting millions of folks dead or wishing that they were,
whereas instead you and others of your wizardly all-or-nothing kind
see no problems or having any remorse in perpetrating cold and hot
wars at the flip of yet another energy starved switch.

Since you're so gosh darn smart and all-knowing (aka WorldFactBook
educated and all), what do we suppose is the percentage of official
and brown-nosed minion spooks and moles (including whatever MIB) as
pretend atheists cloaked within these usenet science and physics
related groups? (I bet it's greater than 90%)

If those others as you say are in fact seeking the same honest goals
as myself, that being affordbly cheap, safe and clean energy that's
made sufficient in surplus for the makings of h2o2 and other viable
energy storage related products, except for their having been doing
such without our public knowledge because these supposed good folks
don't want to tip their good hearted hand, is all fine and perfectly
wise by me as long as we're not talking of decades, because we'll not
likely survive those WWIII decades if stuck on this lethal path of
denial and revenge until the very last drop of bloody oil gets raped
out of our badly traumatised mother Earth. But then I've only been
unsnookered for the past 8 years. (since you're older and so much
wiser than most, say again, what's the extent of your excuse?)

For my being such an "insane-driven" village idiot, how am I doing?
- Brad Guth -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

You have snookered yourself Brad worse than anyone can imagine someone
else doing it to you.

I'm not Jewish and I don't know why you think me a liar, merely
because a variety of internet sources got my middle initial wrong (its
H not J, but my grandfather's middle initial was J which somehow got
associated with me) and because the DOE NREL didn't report publicly a
series of meetings held with a private business to review that
business' research which they agreed to hold private, and because I'm
not forthcoming about things that are critical to my success and
taking measures to avoid the consequences of negative attention
directed at my efforts by major oil companies - haha - these are not
reasons to call someone liar.

As for my background, I am not Jewish and I have no Jewish tradition
today.

However, my forebears were Jewish. In the 15th century Mooks sailed
with Christopher Columbus to the New World to escape the Spanish
Inquisition, thinking trouble with them would blow over by the time
the expedition returned.

When they reached the Azores on their return journey, they found
things had gotten considerably worse in the interim.

So many of the young Jewish sailors made arrangements with Columbus to
take the Nina and sail for Amsterdam and arrange for the return of
the vessel with Christian crews. Amsterdam was a place in the 15th
century where religious toleration and freedom abounded. There was
also ready work was available for the sailors in this nation that
ruled the seas.

The Jewish sailors were welcomed and formed a Jewish Ghetto of Mook
which still exists to this day.

In the middle of the 16th Century many of the Jews there adopted the
Lutheran religion which arose out of Germany at that time.
Lutheranism was seen as a great improvement over the Catholic Church
of this time.

The battle of Mook Heath was fought by many Dutch people and most of
the members of my family alive at that time participated to repel the
Spaniards as they tried to re-establish the control of the Catholic
Church across Europe.

When the Spainiards attacked this stronghold of anti-Catholic teaching
they lost in no small measure due to my forebears - which have a long
fighting tradition.

The Spainiard's were repelled and ultimately won for the Dutch their
independence from the German Empire and the establishment of one of
the first modern free Republics.

My direct ancestors came to the New World and settled in New Amsterdam
and traded fur at the lower tip of Manhattan in the 17th century.
There my great great great grandfather intermarried with the Delaware
Indians at that time and went Westward as the British took charge of
Manhattan in the 18th century and they worked as scouts and fur
traders in the Eastern flank of the Northwest Territory and settled in
Ohio. Mooks were here before Lucas Sullivant settled Franklinton in
1797 and before Ohio became a State in 1803.

This is just my father's side. My mother's side is even more
interesting.

And my father's history before Mook's took on the Jewish traditions in
the 13th century are even more interesting.

Mooks were one of the 4,000 surviving soldiers of the battle of Samara
Bend. At that time they were Taoist in their spiritual outlook, and
adopted the Jewish religion in their wanderings across Europe -
looking for adventure, fortune and a good fight.

Mook is from the Chinese mo kuo quan



Surname signifying great authority

If you see my pic you'll see I'm a mutt - a mixture of many races.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2015
    ... You are not in charge, ... As to lord Mook, and others of your kind, I think that you're all ... Those smart folks like yourself are here within this mostly Yiddish ... energy that reaches the surface of Earth isn't the WorldFactBook 346 w/ ...
    (sci.space.policy)
  • Re: Hydrogen Cars, Trucks, and Buses Are the Answer Indeed
    ... It seems that our resident MI5/CIA spook/mole/wizard William Mook (aka ... otherwise of sufficient energy density to suit most consumer end-use ... Getting that fully loaded tarmac worth of mostly LH2 tonnage up to the ... any one failsafe kind of do-everything form of clean energy that's ...
    (sci.energy.hydrogen)
  • Re: GR ?
    ... > | use Pythagoras's theorem and energy can be defined using Noethers ... > |> This presumably means that you think charge is not an aspect of energy ... If there is an excess of electrons the body is ... > displacement implies the conservation of energy. ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Acceleration of charge
    ... The point seems to be that the energy of a ... but a single lone charge is of course a massive ... otherwise your volume integrals aren't well defined and that's ... I think "dV" is a scalar, ...
    (sci.physics.relativity)
  • Re: Pioneer anomaly engineering questions
    ... charge, even this sub level became inadequate, since Joules ... more clearly examine the really fundamental energy issues. ... I don't disagree with any unit system as long as it is consistent and I ... energy being calculated as a function of transverse acceleration. ...
    (sci.physics)

Loading