Re: Alternative interpretation of the KT boundary and dionsaur die-off

There is indeed a difference. My references to Google Earth and
yellowcake are meant to show that the CIA MUST have lied.

Some of the pictures in GE are of military quality. I looked at my
house. We have built a conservatory and shortly afterwards we took
down a garden shed. GE shows both the garden shed and the conservatory
narrowing the date to summer 2004. We were out at the time. The car
was not in the driveway.

What I am asking you is how the dickins did the CIA continue to witter
on about WMD when pictures of this quality are available. I do not
believe a centrifuge would have fitted into the garden shed. To
hansdle UF6 anyway you need quite a complex piece of equipment. To
make ans store stuff anyway you cannot fail to leave evidence. For
anything nuclear you need quite an infrastructure. It has been said
that a bomb (from raw ingrediants like yellowcake) requires a
structure the size of Sellofield or Cap de la Hague. Chemical
processing can today be miniaturised to some extent, but it still
cannot be done inside a presidential palace. Anyway Ralph Ikea got
inside every palace after a little bit of humming and haing by Saddam
Hussein.

Things like chemical and biological weapons require fume cupboards and
a ventilation system, all of which would be visible at Google Earth
resolution. You can store things in presidential palaces but you
cannot make them there. Less infrastructure than for nuclear, but
still good laboratory facilities.

I do not know what "humint" the CIA received, I am just talking about
the data that must have been present from satellites. Google Earth is
simply 3 primary colors. This gives you resolution. There is data in
UV and IR. There is spectroscopic data on all chemicals escaping. It
seems utterly inconceivable to me that there is not a good picture of
the WMD capability of any state in the world.

Humint will tell us what the intentions were. The humint (admitteldy
post event) tells us the the main priority of SH was internal
rebellion. satellites tell us unambiguously what is there, humint
tells us why it is there. As was the case there was simply nothing
there. It is utterly inconceivale that this was not known.


- Ian Parker

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: 2006 Photos of CIA Hmong Secret Army in Laos
    ... They could lobby CIA and US Government to get those Hmongs in the ... jungle out of Laos and bring them to America. ... Look at the man in second row of pictures, ...
    (soc.culture.laos)
  • Re: [SLE] Google Earth
    ... Quality varies dramatically depending on the pictures available. ... If just wonder about the great fuss about google earth, ... for the Migros store I worked at in the early '90s, ...
    (SuSE)
  • Re: Enlightenment
    ... CIA has an exit off of a highway. ... have been used to take pictures of people taking the CIA exit. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Enlightenment
    ... CIA has an exit off of a highway. ... have been used to take pictures of people taking the CIA exit. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)
  • Re: Enlightenment
    ... CIA has an exit off of a highway. ... have been used to take pictures of people taking the CIA exit. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)