Is you this James Behling?
- From: kT <cosmic@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2007 11:21:00 -0600
behlingjo@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Nov 10, 10:21 am, kT <cos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:behlin...@xxxxxxxxx wrote:On Nov 7, 6:25 pm, kT <cos...@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:Nothing at all significant about 300,000 pounds of cryogenic fuel loadedConsidering that such an extremely advance upper stage has recently beenNo comment, none needed. There is nothing significant.
stretched in order to incorporate more fuel. Any comments, Mr. Talking
out your ass without even a website with designs and numbers to show US.
onto an upper stage that weighs only 35,000 pounds? Au contraire, fair
pony tailed minion. I sense a thrust to weight breakthrough here, that
does not require the assistance of a very large five segment horses ass.
My website?That would be the stick,
NASA.gov
It my employer's
But speaking of an ass
That make's real sense. The stick is an "ass". Not!
Obviously by someone who does know squat about anything and it not in
the aerospace business
I'm in the intellectual property business.
I have a website with lots of numbers, do you want to look at it?
Mineth numerals maketh sense : http://webpages.charter.net/tsiolkovsky
You don't have to tell me that the stick is bad. Known it for years.
Yes, you really are a rocket scientist.
The problem is you don't known why. And it is not the upperstage
You're right, there is nothing wrong with that upper stage, except, well, the oxygen is in the wrong location for atmospheric flight, the engine is the wrong engine for atmospheric flight, and it's greatly overdesigned for a booster, that apparently, due to weight reductions and the inevitable failure of Bush's moon program, it no longer needs.
Actually, the engine doesn't exist, but I have some that do.
Is this you?
http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-96/images/medium/KSC-99PP-0204.jpg
Hey look, it's a dead astronaut. Way to go Jim! Let me guess, you really are a rocket scientist!
I wish you many and various mass and performance surprises and solutions to be revealed November 22, 2007.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is you this James Behling?
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Is you this James Behling?
- From: behlingjo
- Re: Is you this James Behling?
- References:
- >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: gaetanomarano
- Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: behlingjo
- Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: kT
- Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: behlingjo
- Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: kT
- Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- From: behlingjo
- >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- Prev by Date: Re: Ares I first stage design changes again?
- Next by Date: Re: Ares I first stage design changes again?
- Previous by thread: Re: >>> a (nov. 7) Flight International article CONFIRMS that the Ares-1 has problems to fly >>>
- Next by thread: Re: Is you this James Behling?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|