Re: ISS after completion
- From: American <samuelransom@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:46:04 -0800
On Nov 14, 2:38 pm, BradGuth <bradg...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 14, 9:07 am, Harmon <harmon.ever...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
But then, if microgravity research requires a totally separate
vehicle, is there an advantage to having it attached to the ISS? And
if a space resort high inclination orbit is not suitable for Moon and
Mars expedition outfitting, is that also better achieved by using a
separate new vehicle?
Harmon
Are you folks actually that totally dumbfounded about using the
extreme microgravity/picogravity of our moon's L1?
--
Brad Guth
Jeez, Brad, can we first get a start-up launch industry
off the ground? I mean, it's like the moon has become
soooo secondary to being fundamentally interested in
the *possibilities*.
American
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ISS after completion
- From: BradGuth
- Re: ISS after completion
- References:
- ISS after completion
- From: Harmon
- Re: ISS after completion
- From: Jonathan
- Re: ISS after completion
- From: Harmon
- Re: ISS after completion
- From: BradGuth
- ISS after completion
- Prev by Date: Re: ISS after completion
- Next by Date: Re: ISS after completion
- Previous by thread: Re: ISS after completion
- Next by thread: Re: ISS after completion
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|