Re: Is NASA a US "Defence Agency"?

On Nov 16, 12:49 pm, Michael Gallagher <mikejo...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 20:19:29 -0500, "Jonathan" <wr...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:



.... It's becoming clearer every
day that the Vision was created to fill the needs of our
military in terms of the missile defense plans they have
for the future.

How so? Unless there's a later-day Skylab involved, the Orion/Ares 1
stack is useless. The military's use of the shuttle left such a bad
taste in their mouth they switched to ELVs in the late '80s and never
looked back.

Major civilian and military space programs are usually announced as
such. The Shuttle's predecssors -- Mercuy, Gemini, Apollo, and Skylab
--- were all cicvilian programs with nomilitay purposes. It is true
both NASA and the DoD use the same contractos. But it is a very big
leap from there to say the VSE is really about missile defense. Evil
Keneval wouldn't make that leap.

Bare in mind that the "military industrial complex" does more than
military stuff. For instance, Boeing, a major defense contractor,
also makes the commercial jets that holiday travelers will be flying
on this week. But there's no way any rational person could take that
fact and argue that Thanksgiving is a military operation.

Hah! Bush's aviation plan for the holiday season is to use military
airspace for commercial airliners. I guess if his focus is that people
want to be on time for the holidays as his main domestic issue, then
his foriegn policy is in a shambles.


----== Posted via Newsfeeds.Com - Unlimited-Unrestricted-Secure Usenet News==----http://www.newsfeeds.comThe #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups
----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----

.