Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- From: Alex Terrell <alexterrell@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:14:52 -0800 (PST)
On 19 Nov, 18:38, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Alex Terrell <alexterr...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:It would never pay back to go to the moon just for this, but if at the
:
:Imagine this scenario: 2020, and NASA's first six month long mission
:is prospecting. They visit aan old impact site, and find some metal
:fragments with 10% platinum group metals. A quick analysis of the site
:provides an estimate of 1,000 tons of PGMs mixed in with about 10
:million tons of copper, iron, nickel and related metals scattered over
:a few km2.
:
:What would happen then?
:
:Earth prices might fall somewhat, but I suspect lunar exploration
:might speed up somewhat.
:
Too expensive to retrieve. There's be no appreciable market effects
here on Earth. With any luck, this would help provide a driver to
lower transport costs, but even that is the tip of the iceberg.
astronaut's feet?
How are you going to do lunar mining? Lots of technology developmentMining an M-type impactor might be relatively easy. There are no
and testing necessary before any of that become reasonably feasible.
compounds so in theory no chemistry to worry about. Lots of heat
needed, but that's easy to get on the lunar surface.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- From: Fred J . McCall
- Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- References:
- The Economic Development of the Moon
- From: Mark R. Whittington
- Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- From: Alex Terrell
- Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- From: Fred J . McCall
- The Economic Development of the Moon
- Prev by Date: Re: Open letter to Michael Griffin
- Next by Date: Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- Previous by thread: Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- Next by thread: Re: The Economic Development of the Moon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|