Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- From: simberg.interglobal@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg)
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 03:57:24 GMT
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 18:07:56 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
ohara5.0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a
way as to indicate that:
You might say that this is a step towards an orbital market but all
you have to do is to compare E=mgh to E=1/2 mv^2 where v is orbital
velocity to see that suborbital isnt a real step toward orbital.
No, I can't see that, sorry. Even though I'm an astronautical
engineer with three decades of experience, and understand the math.
Can you explain it further?
For orbital, you gotta carry a whole lotta fuel and I dont see Virgin or
Blue Origin or the others trying to do so.
Of course they're not. They have to do things one step at a time.
Can the Virgin ship be modified to carry a big enough engine to get to
200 Km and then can it carry a big enough engine to go orbital?
Of course not. Again, what is the purpose of this seemingly stupid
and irrelevant question?
Otherwise they gotta build a whole new system.
So?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- From: ohara5 . 0
- Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- References:
- Is suborbital a real market?
- From: ohara5 . 0
- Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- From: Rand Simberg
- Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- From: ohara5 . 0
- Is suborbital a real market?
- Prev by Date: Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- Next by Date: Re: Back to the moon? When?
- Previous by thread: Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- Next by thread: Re: Is suborbital a real market?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
|