Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- From: Quadibloc <jsavard@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 06:56:16 -0800 (PST)
On Dec 3, 4:14 am, Ian Parker <ianpark...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
This is the form in which space will increasingly have to
be packaged.
As it happens, I've addressed this in another thread I've started.
I feel that the main rationale for space won't be in direct benefits
to Earth. Nuclear power plants are far more cost-effective than solar
power satellites. Dealing with asteroids is important, but in itself
won't require an ambitious manned space exploration effort.
Instead, although in the long term Earth could benefit directly, the
main reason to put people in space is so that humanity - and the
valuable achievements of humanity - could survive even if problems
developed on Earth. And problems will develop on Earth, since there is
no sign that population growth is being checked.
And that is going to be hard to sell to the man in the street.
John Savard
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- From: Ian Parker
- Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- References:
- Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- From: Mark R. Whittington
- Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- From: Quadibloc
- Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- From: Ian Parker
- Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Prev by Date: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Next by Date: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Previous by thread: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Next by thread: Re: Barack Obama Pits Space Explorers Against School Children
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|