Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- From: gaetanomarano <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 19:44:07 -0800 (PST)
On 4 Dic, 19:37, simberg.interglo...@xxxxxxxxx (Rand Simberg) wrote:
On Tue, 4 Dec 2007 10:29:47 -0800 (PST), in a place far, far away,
behlin...@xxxxxxxxx made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such a way
as to indicate that:
On Dec 3, 10:11 pm, gaetanomarano <m...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/014manymoons.html
Is this a cry for attention?
All of his posts are.
then, also the Ares and Orion launch/missions animations from NASA
(and running everywere, YouTube, forums, etc.) are just made to gain
ATTENTION ?
however, if you say that (maybe) you could be RIGHT, since BOTH
rockets will NEVER fly (in their current design) as explained in this
article:
http://www.ghostnasa.com/posts/012arescantfly.html
..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- From: gaetanomarano
- Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- From: behlingjo
- Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- From: Rand Simberg
- >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- Prev by Date: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Next by Date: Re: Ares vs DIRECT
- Previous by thread: Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- Next by thread: Re: >>> in the same page of the animation I've added a second (static) image with some moons seen from Earth in a city's skyline >>>
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|